Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. American Dairy and Food Consulting Laboratories, Inc.
Filing
113
ORDER DENYING stipulated request to modify the scheduling order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/17/2011. (Timken, A)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
12
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00914-LJO-SKO
ORDER DENYING STIPULATED
REQUEST TO MODIFY THE
SCHEDULING ORDER
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
(Docket No. 111)
AMERICAN DAIRY AND FOOD
CONSULTING LABORATORIES,
17
18
Defendant.
_________________________________
19
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.
20
/
21
22
On October 17, 2011, the parties filed a request to modify the scheduling order so that they
23
would have additional time to complete discovery. (Doc. 111.) The parties request the following
24
changes:
25
Deadline
Current Deadline
Proposed Deadline
26
1.
Non-Expert Discovery
October 20, 2011
December 20, 2011
27
2.
Expert Disclosure
October 24, 2011
December 23, 2011
28
3.
Supp. Exp. Discl.
November 14, 2011
January 13, 2012
1
4.
Exp. Discovery
2
5.
Non-Disp. Filing Deadline October 24, 2011
December 23, 2011
3
6.
Non-Disp. Motion Hearing November 18, 2011
January 20, 2012
4
7.
Disp. Mot. Filing Deadline November 3, 2011
January 6, 2012
5
8.
Disp. Motion Hearing
January 9, 2012
March 12, 2012
6
9.
Settlement Conference
December 13, 2011
February 14, 2012
7
10.
Pretrial Conference
January 23, 2012
March 26, 2012
8
11.
Trial Date
March 6, 2012
May 8, 2012
December 5, 2011
February 5, 2012
9
The proposed deadlines do not leave the Court with sufficient time between the dispositive
10
motion hearing date and the pretrial conference for the Court to consider and make a determination
11
on any pending motions.
12
The Court is willing to accommodate the parties’ request for a modified schedule, but cannot
13
adopt the dates proposed in the stipulation. If the parties wish to re-file their request for an extension
14
of the schedule, they should propose dates that maintain at least six weeks between the hearing date
15
for the dispositive motions and the pretrial conference date as well as at least six weeks between the
16
date of the pretrial conference and the date of the trial. Further, any proposed pretrial conference
17
date should fall on either a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday.
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
Dated:
ie14hj
October 17, 2011
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
