Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. American Dairy and Food Consulting Laboratories, Inc.
Filing
158
ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S EXCEEDING PAGE LIMITS signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 17, 2012. (Munoz, I)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
HARTFORD CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
13
CASE NO. CV F 09-0914 LJO SKO
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S EXCEEDING
PAGE LIMITES
Plaintiff,
vs.
14
15
(Doc. 147.)
AMERICAN DAIRY FOOD
CONSULTING LABORATORIES,
INC.
16
Defendant.
17
/
18
19
AND RELATED COUNTER ACTION.
20
___________________________________/
21
22
Defendant/counterclaimant American Dairy and Food Consulting Laboratories, Inc. (“American
23
Dairy”) filed a memorandum of points and authorities which far exceeds this Court’s standing order on
24
page limits. The standing order does not appear on the docket because this case was reassigned from
25
retired U.S. District Judge Oliver W. Wanger to U.S. District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill. Nonetheless,
26
plaintiff/counterdefendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (“Hartford”) was aware of the page
27
limits and obtained leave to file a memorandum of points and authorities in excess of page limits.
28
This Court considered to strike American Dairy’s memorandum of points and authorities.
1
1
However, given the absence of the standing order on the docket, this Court will overlook American
2
Dairy’s disobedience of the page limits this one time.
3
In addition, this Court GRANTS Hartford up to 15 pages for its reply points and authorities. This
4
Court FURTHER ORDERS the parties to provide this Court with courtesy copies of all summary
5
judgment papers, if they have not done so already.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
66h44d
April 17, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?