Hartford Casualty Insurance Company v. American Dairy and Food Consulting Laboratories, Inc.

Filing 50

ORDER Modifying the January 19, 2010 Scheudling Order all dates Idetified therein by four weeks: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 12/6/2010, Discovery due by 12/13/2010, Dispositive Motions filed by 1/27/2011, Dispositive Motion Hearing set for 3/7/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger, Non-Dispositive Motions filed by 12/28/2010, Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing set for 2/4/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, Jury Tri al set for 5/31/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger, Pretrial Conference set for 4/18/2011 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (OWW) before Judge Oliver W. Wanger, Settlement Conference set for 12/15/2010 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 4/20/2010. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DEAN B. HERMAN (SBN 076752) CATHERINE L. RIVARD (SBN 126237) V. RENE DALEY (SBN 199914) MENDES & MOUNT, LLP 445 S. Figueroa Street, 38th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Tel: (213) 955-7700 Fax: (213) 955-7725 E-mail: Dean.Herman@Mendes.com Catherine.Rivard@Mendes.com Rene.Daley@Mendes.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. AMERICAN DAIRY AND FOOD CONSULTING LABORATORIES, INC., and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 1:09-cv-00914-OWW-DLB ORDER MODIFYING THE JANUARY 19, 2010 SCHEDULING ORDER TO CONTINUE ALL DATES IDENTIFIED THEREIN BY FOUR WEEKS AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. The Court has considered all papers filed in connection with plaintiff Hartford Casualty Insurance Company's motion for an order advancing the hearing on Hartford's motion to disqualify Plaintiff American Dairy and Food Consulting Laboratory, Inc.'s counsel, or alternatively to continue by four weeks all of the dates set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order of January 19, 2010 (the "Prior Scheduling Order"). Plaintiff Hartford Casualty Insurance Company's motion is appropriate for resolution without oral ORDER MODIFYING THE JANUARY 19, 2010 SCHEDULING ORDER Error! Unknown document property name. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 78-230(h). Having considered all the evidence and legal authorities set forth in the papers submitted, the Court denies the motion to advance and grants the alternative motion to continue the dates in the Prior Scheduling Order. IT IS ORDERED that each of the dates identified in the Prior Scheduling Order be continued as follows: Event Description Expert Witness Disclosure Rebuttal/Supplemental Expert Witness Disclosure Discovery Completion Date Settlement Conference Date Filing Deadline for NonDispositive Motions Filing Deadline for Dispositive Motions Hearing Date for NonDispositive Motions Hearing Date for Dispositive Motions Pretrial Conference Date Trial Date March 21, 2011 May 3, 2011 April 18, 2011 May 31, 2011 February 7, 2011 March 7, 2011 January 7, 2011 February 4, 2011 December 30, 2010 January 27, 2011 November 15, 2010 November 17, 2010 November 30, 2010 December 13, 2010 December 15, 2010 December 28, 2010 Superseded Date October 8, 2010 November 8, 2010 Operative Date November 5, 2010 December 6, 2010 IT IS SO ORDERED. ORDER MODIFYING THE JANUARY 19, 2010 SCHEDULING ORDER Error! Unknown document property name. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: DEAC_Signature-END: April 20, 2010 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE emm0d64h ORDER MODIFYING THE JANUARY 19, 2010 SCHEDULING ORDER Error! Unknown document property name.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?