Avila v. Cate et al

Filing 45

ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANTS' 22 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT from Court's Calendar until Motion is submitted pursuant to Local Rule 230(L), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 03/19/2012. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8

PERRY ROBERT AVILA,

9

Plaintiff,

10
11

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00918-LJO-SKO PC
ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FROM COURT’S CALENDAR UNTIL
MOTION IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO
LOCAL RULE 230(L)

v.
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

12

Defendants.

(Doc. 22)
/

13
14

On March 7, 2011, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Due to ongoing

15

discovery disputes between the parties, the latest of which involves a motion to compel and for

16

sanctions filed by Plaintiff on February 27, 2012, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition and the Court

17

is unable to resolve the motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). Accordingly, in light of 28 U.S.C. §

18

476(a)(1), the Civil Justice Reform Act, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is ORDERED

19

CONTINUED from the Court’s calendar until Plaintiff’s opposition is filed and the motion is

20

submitted pursuant to Local Rule 230(l).1

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Dated:
b9ed48

March 19, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28

1

This order is solely administrative and nothing is required of the parties.

1