Collins et al v. Sheri I. Provost

Filing 29

ORDER Vacating Scheduling Conference; ORDER Dismissing Respondent's Filing as Moot; ORDER Directing Clerk to Close Case signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 02/10/2010. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 O n June 1, 2009, Petitioners United States of America and Marilyn Collins, R e v e n u e Officer, Internal Revenue Service, filed a Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue S e rv ic e Summons. (Doc. 1.) O n June 11, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued an Order to Show Cause Re E n f o rc e m e n t of the Internal Revenue Service Summons. (Doc. 5.) A show cause hearing was held on November 13, 2009, wherein all parties a p p e a re d . (Doc. 19.) Thereafter, on November 16, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and R e c o m m e n d a tio n s recommending that the petition be granted and that Respondent Sheri L . Provost be ordered to appear before Revenue Officer Collins. (Doc. 20.) U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA and MARILYN COLLINS, Revenue O f f ic e r, Internal Revenue Service, ) ) ) ) P e titio n e rs , ) ) v. ) ) S H E R I L. PROVOST, ) ) R e s p o n d e n t. ) _________________________________ ) 1 :0 9 -c v -0 0 9 6 1 -A W I-G S A ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER DISMISSING RESPONDENT'S FILING AS MOOT ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE CASE 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 // // // O n December 21, 2009, this Court issued an Order Adopting the Findings and R e c o m m e n d a tio n s , wherein Respondent was ordered to appear before Revenue Officer C o llin s on January 13, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., to provide testimony and produce documents. (Doc. 22.) O n February 1, 2010, Respondent filed a document entitled "Notice of Declaratory J u d g m e n t and Record," wherein she lists herself as "Secured Party Creditor, Counter C la im a n t, [and] Affiant." Respondent seeks an order declaring that she is: (1) "the only p a rty who has put any value into SHERI LYNNE PROVOST;" (2) "the only party e n title d to any equity attached to SHERI LYNNE PROVOST;" (3)"entitled to any in te rp le a d e d funds related to SHERI LYNNE PROVOST;" and that (4) Petitioners "be b a rre d from any collection of any alleged debts from Sheri Lynne Provost, relating to S H E R I LYNNE PROVOST . . .." (Doc. 25 at 10-11.) O n February 9, 2010, Petitioners filed a notice of compliance indicating that R e sp o n d e n t has complied with the tax summons. As a result, Petitioners request the C o u rt close the case and take the scheduling conference off calendar. (Doc. 27.) That same date, Petitioners filed an opposition to Respondent's Notice for D e c la ra to ry Judgment and Record. More particularly, Petitioners oppose Respondent's n o tic e on the basis it was not properly noticed, that Petitioners have requested the Court c lo s e the matter and therefore any relief requested by Respondent is moot, and that d e c la ra to ry judgment is inappropriate to the instant proceeding. (Doc. 28.) R e sp o n d e n t having complied with the IRS summons, Petitioners' enforcement a c tio n is appropriately closed, and Respondent's request for declaratory judgment is m o o t. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. T h e scheduling conference set for March 16, 2010, at 9:30 a.m., before M a g istra te Judge Gary S. Austin be VACATED; 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. T h e notice filed by Respondent on February 1, 2010, be dismissed as M O O T in light of Respondent's compliance with the summons that was the s u b je c t of this action and Petitioners' request to close the case; and 3. T h e Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. D a te d : 0m8i78 February 10, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii C H IE F UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?