Lawson v. Youngblood

Filing 78

ORDER Granting U.S. Marshals' Request for Reimbursement of Costs of Serving Defendant Chang 73 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/20/14. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 RICHARD ALAN LAWSON, Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 Case No. 1:09-cv-00992-LJO-MJS (PC) ORDER GRANTING U.S. MARSHALS’ REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF SERVING DEFENDANT CHANG DONALD YOUNGBLOOD, et al., (ECF No. 73) Defendants. 16 17 18 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 On January 11, 2012, the Court ordered the United States Marshals Service 21 (“Marshal”) to serve process upon the Defendants in this case. (ECF No. 26.) The Marshal 22 was directed to attempt to secure a waiver of service before attempting personal service on 23 the Defendants. If a waiver of service was not returned by a Defendant within sixty days, 24 the Marshal was directed to effect personal service on the Defendant in accordance with 25 the provisions of Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c), 26 without prepayment of costs, and to file the return of service with evidence of any attempt 27 to secure a waiver of service and with evidence of all costs subsequently incurred in 28 effecting personal service. 1 The Marshal attempted to secure a waiver of service and then attempted personal 1 2 service on Defendant Chang, Kern County Sheriff Deputy, but was unsuccessful. On 3 September 17, 2012, the Marshal filed a return of service as unexecuted for Defendant 4 Chang. (ECF No. 42.) On October 29, 2012, the Court ordered the Marshal to re-attempt service on 5 6 Defendant Chang and ordered that if Chang were located and failed to waive service, the 7 costs of personal service would be taxed against him. (ECF No. 53.) 8 On February 10, 2014, the Marshal filed a request for reimbursement of costs for 9 serving Defendant Chang (ECF No. 73) along with an executed return of summons and 10 USM-285 form showing personal service costs of $71.83. (ECF No. 74.) The USM-285 11 form shows that a waiver of service form was mailed to Defendant Chang on November 5, 12 2012, and that he was personally served on February 4, 2014. 13 Defendant Chang objects to the reimbursement request. He argues that in February 14 or March 2013 he was served by substitution and entered his appearance in the action and 15 thereby rendered waiver of service unnecessary and the costs of subsequent personal 16 service not reimbursable. 17 II. 18 DISCUSSION Rule 4 provides that “[a]n individual, corporation, or association that is subject to 19 service under Rule 4(e), (f), or (h) has a duty to avoid unnecessary expenses of serving the 20 summons.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). “If a defendant located within the United States fails, 21 without good cause, to sign and return a waiver requested by a plaintiff located within the 22 United States, the court must impose on the defendant . . . the expenses later incurred in 23 making service . . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2)(A). 24 It appears that Defendant Chang was given the opportunity required by Rule 4(d)(1) 25 to waive service, but he failed to return his waiver to the Marshal. Defendant Chang claims 26 he was served by substitution but does not set forth any evidence as to precisely when or 27 how he responded with an act that satisfied the requirement to timely execute the Marshal’s 28 waiver. His appearance by answer filed March 28, 2013 did not satisfy the need to return 2 1 the Marshal’s waiver or show good cause for his failure to do so. The Court finds Defendant Chang failed to sign and return the waiver requested by 2 3 the Marshal and that costs incurred in effecting service should be imposed upon him. 4 III. ORDER 5 For the reasons stated, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request by the U.S. 6 Marshals Service for reimbursement of $71.83 in costs incurred in serving Defendant 7 Chang (ECF No. 73) is GRANTED. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 20, 2014 17 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC _Signature- END: 18 Michael J. Seng 12eob4 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?