Lawson v. Youngblood

Filing 81

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF to Clarify His Current Address signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/1/2014. Notice due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD ALAN LAWSON, Case No. 1:09-cv-00992-LJO-MJS (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CLARIFY HIS CURRENT ADDRESS v. (ECF No. 79) 14 DONALD YOUNGBLOOD, et al., THIRTY DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s notice of change of address filed March 28, 2014 (ECF 21 No. 79) which changes his address of record from the California Medical Facility in 22 Vacaville, CA, to that of a non-attorney private party in Bakersfield, CA. 23 A party acting in pro se is required to provide the Court with his or her current 24 address. Local Rule 183(b). A non-attorney may not represent or appear for a pro se 25 party. Local Rule 183(a). The address of a non-attorney may not be used where it is not the 26 pro se party’s current address. 27 28 The Court cannot determine from the record which of the above addresses is Plaintiff’s current address. 1 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. than thirty days from filing of this Order, and 3 4 Plaintiff shall notify the Court of his residence current address by not later 2. The Clerk of the Court shall serve this Order on Plaintiff at both of the following addresses: 5 6 7 8 9 Richard Alan Lawson D-30022 California Medical Facility (2500) P.O. Box 2500 Vacaville, CA 95696-2500 Richard Alan Lawson c/o Leland Terrell 334 Clifton St., Bakersfield, CA 93307 10 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 1, 2014 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?