Short v. Sanzberro et al

Filing 15

ORDER DENYING Motions as MOOT 7 , 10 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/17/09. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Rodney L. Short, a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 9, 2009. As a result of the filing of this action, certain case opening documents were generated by the Clerk's Office on June 10, 2009, including a First Informational Order. (Doc. 4.) On June 11, 2009, the undersigned issued First Informational Order. (Doc. 6.) On June 17, 2009, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to have the informational order issued on June 10, 2009, corrected, and on July 30, 2009, Plaintiff filed an amended motion seeking the same relief. The basis of Plaintiff's motions is the inclusion of language in the order identifying this case as brought by a prisoner. The First Informational Order issued on June 10, 2009, was superceded by the issuance of the First Informational Order on June 11, 2009, which does not contain the language objected to by /// /// /// 1 v. JOHN SANZBERRO, et al., Defendants. / RODNEY L. SHORT, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00996-OWW-GSA PC ORDER DENYING MOTIONS AS MOOT (Docs. 7 and 10) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff. Therefore, there is nothing in the operative informational order requiring correction and Plaintiff's motions are HEREBY DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6i0kij December 17, 2009 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?