Short v. Sanzberro et al

Filing 29

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 25 , signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 11/30/10: Plaintiff's Opposition/Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is due within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order. (Hellings, J)

(PC) Short v. Sanzberro et al

Doc. 29

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff Rodney L. Short, a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this 16 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 9, 2009. This action is proceeding against 17 Defendants Sanzberro, Grijalva, Kowall for use of excessive force and is proceeding against 18 Sanzberro, Grijalva, Kowall, Roggencamp and Gill for denial of due process arising from the 19 forcible medication of Plaintiff. 20 On August 10, 2010, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. On September 10, 2010, this 21 court granted Plaintiff's motion for a thirty day extension in order to file an opposition. Plaintiff 22 failed to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion by the deadline. Local 23 Rule 230(l). 24 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. 26 motion to dismiss within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order; and 27 2 28 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

RODNEY L. SHORT, Plaintiff, v. SANZBERRO, et al., Defendants. /

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00996-OWW-GBC (PC) ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 25) THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants'

The failure to respond to Defendants' motion in compliance with this order will

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 30, 2010 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2