Van Horn v. The Glidden Company et al

Filing 20

STIPULATION for DISMISSAL of Complaint With Prejudice Per FRCP 41(A)(2) and ORDER, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 6/25/10: Action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

WILLIAM J. SMITH #056116 SHELLEY G. BRYANT #222925 2 AMANDA B. NEWELL #251160 SMITH & BRYANT, INC.
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /1/
/// //

2350 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 132 Fresno, California 93711 [phone] Telephone [phone] Facsimile

Attorneys for Plaintiff, KEVIN R. VAN HORN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN R. VAN HORN, Plaintiff,
vs.

Case No. 1:09-cv-01040-OWW-GSA STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PER FRCP 41(A)(2) AND ORDER THEREON

THE GLIDDEN COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants.

Complaint Filed: May 5, 2009 Plaintiff, KEVIN R. VAN HORN, by and through his attorneys of record, and Defendant THE GLIDDEN COMPANY, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to dismissal of this action with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. Dated: June 9, 2010
///

SMITH & BRYANT, INC.

HEL . BRYANT, Attorney for KE h VAN HORN

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PER FRCP 41(A)(2) AND ORDER THEREON, Case No. 1:09-cv-01040-OWW-GSA Page 1

Dated: June 9, 2010

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

LAURA J. MAECHTLEN, Attorney for Defen THE GLIDDEN COMPANY

ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:

June 25, 2010
D AC_Sigatue- ND E n rE :

/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE emm0d64h

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PER FRCP 41(A)(2) AND ORDER THEREON, Case No. 1:09-cv-01040-0WW-GSA Page 2