San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Locke et al

Filing 660

JOINT STIPULATION Regarding CVP And SWP Operations In 2012, ORDER, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/17/2012. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

THE CONSOLIDATED SALMON CASES
_______________________________________
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER
AUTHORITY, et al. v. GARY F. LOCKE, et
al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-1053)
_____________________________________
STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT v.
NOAA, et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-1090)
_____________________________________

1:09-cv-1053-LJO-DLB
1:09-cv-1090-LJO-DLB
1:09-cv-1378-LJO-DLB
1:09-cv-1520-LJO-DLB
1:09-cv-2452-LJO-DLB
1:09-cv-1625-LJO-SMS
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
CVP AND SWP OPERATIONS IN 2012

STATE WATER CONTRACTORS v. GARY Judge: Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill
F. LOCKE, et al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-1378)
_____________________________________
KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY, et al. v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al.
(Case No. 1:09-cv-1520)
_____________________________________
OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, et al.
v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et
al. (Case No. 1:09-cv-2452)
_____________________________________
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA v. NMFS, et al.
(Case No. 1:09-cv-1625)

25
26
27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CVP AND SWP OPERATIONS IN 2012

(1:09-CV-1053 OWW DLB)

1
2

RECITALS
1.

On March 5, 2010, the Court entered its Memorandum Decision Re Cross-Motions

3

for Summary Judgment On NEPA Issues (Doc. 266), and on March 17, 2010 entered its Order

4

Granting In Part Motion for Summary Judgment On NEPA Issues (Doc. 288). This decision

5

found that the United States Bureau of Reclamation and the Secretary of the Interior have violated

6

the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to perform any NEPA analysis prior to adopting

7

and implementing the 2009 Salmonid Biological Opinion ("2009 Salmonid BiOp"). On

8

September 20, 2011, the Court entered its Memorandum Decision re Cross Motions for Summary

9

Judgment (Doc. 633) in these Consolidated Salmonid Cases regarding the 2009 Salmonid BiOp.

10

This decision found the 2009 Salmonid BiOp and its reasonable and prudent alternative (“RPA”)

11

arbitrary, capricious, and unlawful. On September 29, 2011, the Court entered its Order Re

12

Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. 643) and remanding without vacatur the 2009

13

Salmonid BiOp to the National Marine Fisheries Service ("NMFS") for further consideration in

14

accordance with the Court’s rulings and the requirements of law. The September 29 Order

15

provides that the remand without vacatur is without prejudice to “the hearing or decision of any

16

provisional remedy justified in law or equity,” and further that the Court “retains jurisdiction over

17

this matter to the fullest extent permitted by law.”

18

2.

On December 7, 2011, the Court issued a minute order in the Salmonid Cases

19

acknowledging the joint report filed by the parties to the litigation. In addition, the Court

20

indicated that parties may present stipulations on other matters, including project operations in

21

2012, to the Court and if agreement on such matters cannot be reached, the parties shall file a

22

joint status report no later than January 6, 2012, briefly summarizing the nature of any remaining

23

disputes and articulating the anticipated need for, and timing of, further motions practice. On

24

December 12, 2011, the Court issued a Final Judgment (Including Schedule for Remand) (Doc.

25

655) in the case in accordance with the Memoranda and Orders described above that included a

26

schedule for reconsidering the remanded biological opinion and compliance with NEPA.

27
28

3.

Consistent with the Court’s minute order, the parties have been engaged in

discussions to reach agreement on the manner in which the RPA will be modified and applied
2
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CVP AND SWP OPERATIONS IN 2012

(1:09-CV-1053 OWW DLB)

1

during Water Year 2012. The parties executing this agreement have reached an agreement on

2

certain actions and agree to modifications to the RPA Action IV.2.1 as described below for April

3

1 through May 31, 2012 operations only. The parties intend to continue discussions regarding

4

other Water Year 2012 operations over the coming weeks, and intend to bring additional

5

settlement stipulation(s) on 2012 operations before the Court if agreement can be reached prior to

6

the onset of those operational actions. In addition to 2012 operations, the parties executing this

7

agreement have agreed upon specific monitoring, studies and other actions described below.

8
9

STIPULATION
In the context of the foregoing recitals, Plaintiffs San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water

10

Authority, Westlands Water District, State Water Contractors, Metropolitan Water District of

11

Southern California, Coalition for a Sustainable Delta, and Kern County Water Agency

12

("Plaintiffs"), Oakdale Irrigation District, South San Joaquin Irrigation District, and Stockton East

13

Water District ("Stanislaus River Plaintiffs"), Plaintiff-Intervenor California Department of Water

14

Resources ("DWR"), and Federal Defendants by and through their respective counsel, hereby

15

stipulate and agree as follows:

16

1.

All parties agree to the following operations of the Central Valley Project (“CVP”)

17

and State Water Project (“SWP”), and related actions herein, for April 1, 2012 through May 31,

18

2012. This agreement was reached based on consideration of specific hydrologic, storage and

19

fish conditions. This agreement is not intended to be used as a basis for a new biological

20

assessment or biological opinion. The agreement in Section 2 below regarding 2012 operations is

21

limited to operation of RPA Action IV.2.1, and applies only if the barrier at the Head of Old

22

River is installed.

23
24

2.

The CVP and SWP projects shall implement the following actions in 2012:
a.

Operation at the Head of Old River from April 1 through May 31 if a rock

25

barrier is installed.

26

i.

DWR will install a rock barrier at the Head of Old River, if flows at

27

Vernalis allow for its installation and maintenance from April 1 through May 31 [approximately

28

less than 6,000 cubic feet per second (“cfs”)]. Up to eight culverts (of approximately the same
3
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CVP AND SWP OPERATIONS IN 2012

(1:09-CV-1053 OWW DLB)

1

size and configuration as used in previous barrier designs) may be installed in the rock barrier.

2

ii.

When the rock barrier is installed, the SWP and CVP shall be operated to

3

maintain Old and Middle River (“OMR”) flows between -1,250 and -3,500 cfs in April, and

4

between -1,250 and -5,000 cfs in May, depending on the real-time operations process described

5

below in subsections iii-vi. Nothing in this section is intended to, or does, prevent the projects

6

from operating more conservatively for delta smelt protection. While the rock barrier is in place

7

and the SWP and CVP are operating to the OMR flows as provided herein, the SWP and CVP

8

will not operate to the San Joaquin River Inflow to Export ratio described under RPA Action

9

IV.2.1.

10
11
12

iii.

The exception procedure for health and safety in RPA Action IV.2.1 for

minimum combined SWP and CVP pumping of 1,500 cfs will be maintained.
iv.

NMFS, DWR, and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (“Reclamation”) will

13

co-host a technical workshop in early February, with Delta Operations for Salmonids and

14

Sturgeon group (“DOSS”) members and other outside experts, to review data availability,

15

modeling tools and outputs and other scientific approaches for establishing real-time operations

16

screening criteria for OMR parameter selection within the specified ranges.

17

v.

At least two weeks prior to April 1, 2012, NMFS, with information

18

submitted by members of the DOSS and other outside experts, will prepare a real-time operations

19

technical memorandum to guide weekly or daily decision-making. Real-time operations

20

screening criteria will be developed based on hydrodynamics and Particle Tracking Model

21

(“PTM”) runs, and other relevant available scientific information and considerations, such as:

22

(a) the fraction of particles that reach Chipps Island; (b) particle residence time; (c) results

23

showing particle capture at various diversions in the delta, and (d) relevant available information

24

from trawls and rotary screw trap information, salvage, hydrodynamics, empirical data from

25

previous VAMP studies, survival equations, and a modified Delta Passage Model. The DOSS

26

will advise the Water Operations Management Team (“WOMT”) and NMFS on the appropriate

27

OMR parameter within the specified ranges. The DOSS will consider all relevant available

28

scientific information, such as listed above, in determining its advice. The DOSS will provide its
4
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CVP AND SWP OPERATIONS IN 2012

(1:09-CV-1053 OWW DLB)

1

information and advice to the WOMT for its consideration in developing a recommendation to

2

NMFS for actions to protect salmonids and green sturgeon. The WOMT will supply information

3

for NMFS to consider, including water supply impacts. NMFS shall make the final determination

4

on OMR flow within the specified ranges to be implemented by Reclamation and DWR, after

5

attempting to first meet with WOMT, and shall explain its determination in writing based on the

6

best available science. NMFS will increase the transparency of the decision process by

7

documenting the basis for its decisions and providing a written explanation of them and the basis

8

for them to interested parties via NMFS’ website. All parties to this agreement agree that the

9

final determinations made by NMFS pursuant to this Section 2 are binding and in consideration of

10

this agreement hereby waive all rights to seek relief from the court from these determinations and

11

from operation of the projects by DWR and Reclamation in accordance with those

12

determinations; however, this stipulation shall not waive any party’s right to raise other claims or

13

defenses as to other CVP and SWP operations or actions under the 2009 Salmonid BiOp.1

14

vi.

In order to facilitate availability of real-time information to the agencies,

15

DWR will convene a Delta Conditions Team (“DCT”) consisting of scientists and engineers from

16

the state and Federal agencies, Plaintiffs, and Defendant-Intervenors to review the real time

17

operations and Delta conditions, including potential modeling utilizing the Delta Passage Model,

18

PTM, and other applicable modeling tools, in conjunction with the real time monitoring, to assist

19

in evaluating the potential effects of planned water operations on salmonids and sturgeon. The

20

members of the DCT will provide its individual information to DOSS in accordance with a

21

process provided by the DOSS, which currently meets on Tuesday mornings, to assess risks to

22

salmonids and sturgeon based upon Delta conditions and the other factors set forth above.

23

vii.

In order to generate information on migration routes and survivals across

24

variable operating conditions in order to inform decision-making for project operations, DWR

25

and Reclamation agree to fund the development and deployment of a broadened acoustic tagging

26

and release program in 2012, which will track juvenile salmon and juvenile steelhead migrations

27
28

1

Furthermore, nothing in this agreement waives the right of any party to assert whatever
privileges may otherwise be available to it by law.
5
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CVP AND SWP OPERATIONS IN 2012

(1:09-CV-1053 OWW DLB)

1

through the south Delta for the purpose of generating better information by which to manage

2

south Delta operations and other activities to improve fish survival efficiently and effectively.

3

The person or organization selected by the parties to conduct such studies will collaborate with

4

the NMFS-Southwest Fisheries Science Center (“NMFS-SWFSC”) in designing and conducting

5

these studies. To the extent any information from such studies is available for use in 2012, the

6

parties agree that the information will be used in the decision-making process in determining

7

2012 operations pursuant to this stipulation. Such an acoustic tag program may include:

8
9

1.
locations in the south Delta;

10
11

Weekly releases of hatchery-origin steelhead and salmon at key

2.

Deployment of monitoring capabilities to detect juvenile migrations

through the south Delta through various routes of migration;

12

3.

Deployment of monitoring capabilities to develop improved

13

information on the effect of water operations of the SWP and the CVP on juvenile salmon and

14

juvenile steelhead migrations through the Delta under varying hydraulic conditions; and

15
16

4.

Development of data gathering and reporting capabilities to support

improved in-season real time water operations over the course of juvenile migrations.

17

b.

NMFS, the other Federal agencies, plaintiff-intervenor DWR, plaintiffs, and

18

defendant-intervenors have engaged in discussions pertaining to south Delta operations if flows at

19

Vernalis are greater than that which would allow a rock barrier to be installed at the Head of Old

20

River. This stipulated agreement for operation in lieu of RPA Action IV.2.1 in 2012 does not

21

address CVP and SWP operations under that scenario but parties may continue to meet to develop

22

possible operations under such high flow conditions where a rock barrier cannot be installed.

23

3.

DWR will submit to NMFS and the California Department of Fish and Game

24

(“DFG”) a predator monitoring study for their review and permit compliance procedures, as

25

appropriate. If a rock barrier is installed, the predator monitoring study will evaluate predation

26

associated with the installation and operation of the rock barrier. If the rock barrier is not

27

installed, the predator monitoring study will evaluate predation at the scour hole downstream of

28

the junction of the San Joaquin River and the Head of Old River. In addition, predator
6
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CVP AND SWP OPERATIONS IN 2012

(1:09-CV-1053 OWW DLB)

1

monitoring efforts will be implemented at location(s) to be determined, for example, at the CVP

2

export facility in front of trash racks, at the scour hole mentioned above, or in other location(s) in

3

the Delta. In addition, DWR commits to developing a study for a pilot predator removal and

4

control program that will be submitted to NMFS and DFG for review and comment.

5

4.

NMFS will have an opportunity to be involved in design and development of studies

6

and will work with DWR, DFG and Public Water Agencies2 to further refine the following

7

actions:

8

a.

Examination of other monitoring systems. DWR and Reclamation will

9

commence in the first quarter of 2012 to examine the opportunities to deploy other monitoring

10

and tracking tools for tracking juvenile and adult migrations of salmonids and other fish species

11

within and through the Delta, utilizing PIT tags or other technologies as may be available. In

12

examining such opportunities, DWR and Reclamation agree to utilize the available expertise of

13

the fishery agencies, the university community, the consulting community and other sources of

14

expertise.

15

b.

Life-cycle modeling: The parties agree that the timely development of a

16

Central Valley salmon life-cycle model is vital to inform Bay-Delta decision-making. The model

17

will be developed by and under the control of the NMFS-SWFSC, and, subject to the availability

18

of funding, the NMFS-SWFSC shall utilize a broad array of expertise outside of NMFS as

19

appropriate. Such an expanded program may also be guided by a panel of experts convened by

20

the Interagency Ecosystem Program or other appropriate expert agency. DWR and Reclamation

21

will consider providing funding to the NMFS-SWFSC to accelerate the development of the

22

model.

23
24
25
26
27
28

2

“Public Water Agencies” consist of state and federal water contractors who receive
water from the SWP and CVP and are Metropolitan Water Agency of Southern California, Kern
County Water Agency, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, Westlands Water District,
and Santa Clara Valley Water District, and State Water Project Contractors Authority
(“SWPCA”) and State and Federal Contractors Water Agency (“SFCWA”). The Stanislaus River
Plaintiffs are also considered “Public Water Agencies” for the purpose of this stipulation and for
the purposes of any engagement process related to ESA Section 7 consultation involving New
Melones operations.
7
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CVP AND SWP OPERATIONS IN 2012

(1:09-CV-1053 OWW DLB)

1

c.

DWR and Reclamation will continue the Chinook salmon acoustic tag survival

2

studies that have been implemented through the Vernalis Adaptive Management Program, in

3

conjunction with the 6-year acoustic tagging experiment.

4

5.

DWR, Reclamation and the Public Water Agencies agree to work with NMFS to

5

design, develop, and fund a program to provide additional fish tagging and monitoring that could

6

further inform Bay-Delta decision-making.

7

6.

As authorized under the State Water Resources Control Board Decision 1641,

8

Reclamation and DWR may divert or redivert water of the SWP and CVP between Jones

9

Pumping Plant and Banks Pumping Plant in April and May to reduce fish losses and to benefit

10

fish. The CVP will develop and implement standard operating procedures to minimize longfin

11

and Delta smelt losses and salmonid losses, as specified in the 2009 BiOp, during the cleaning of

12

the louvers.

13

7.

This stipulated agreement for operations does not address or include RPA Action

14

IV.2.3, which provides for OMR Flow Management from January through June 15. However, the

15

parties commit in 2012 to continue discussions to develop a monitoring-based trigger, or other

16

real-time operations approach, that would modify in 2013 the January 1 onset of Action IV.2.3.

17

8.

By June 2012, DWR and Reclamation will submit to NMFS for review a list of

18

possible habitat restoration projects targeted to improve survival of steelhead migrating out of the

19

San Joaquin Basin. The parties expect that DWR and Reclamation will confer with DFG in

20

compiling this list.

21

SO STIPULATED.

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
8
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CVP AND SWP OPERATIONS IN 2012

(1:09-CV-1053 OWW DLB)

1

Dated: January 12, 2012

NOSSAMAN LLP

2
By: PAUL S. WEILAND
___________________________________
PAUL S. WEILAND
AUDREY HUANG
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
KERN COUNTY WATER AGENCY and
COALITION FOR A SUSTAINABLE DELTA

3
4
5
6
Dated: January 12, 2012
7
8
9

H. CRAIG MANSON
Westlands Water District
DIEPENBROCK HARRISON
A Professional Corporation
KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN
& GIRARD
A Professional Corporation

10
By: DANIEL J. O’HANLON
___________________________________
DANIEL J. O’HANLON
EILEEN M. DIEPENBROCK
Attorneys for Plaintiffs SAN LUIS
& DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY
and WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT

11
12
13
14
15

Dated: January 12, 2012

BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK LLP

16
By: STEVEN O.SIMS
___________________________________
STEVEN O. SIMS
MICHELLE C. KALES
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT

17
18
19
20

Dated: January 12, 2012

BEST BEST & KRIEGER, LLP

21
22
23
24

By: GREGORY K. WILKINSON
___________________________________
GREGORY K. WILKINSON
STEVEN M. ANDERSON
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STATE WATER CONTRACTORS

25
26
27
28
9
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CVP AND SWP OPERATIONS IN 2012

(1:09-CV-1053 OWW DLB)

1

Dated: January 12, 2012

MORRISON & FOERSTER, LLP

2
By: CHRISTOPHER J.CARR
___________________________________
CHRISTOPHER J. CARR
WILLIAM M. SLOAN
Attorneys for Plaintiff METROPOLITAN WATER
DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

3
4
5
6

Dated: January 12, 2012

HERUM CRABTREE

7
By: JENNIFER L. SPALETTA
___________________________________
JENNIFER L. SPALETTA
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT

8
9
10
Dated: January 12, 2012

O'LAUGHLIN & PARIS LLP

11
12

By: WILLIAM C. PARIS III
___________________________________
WILLIAM C. PARIS III
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and
SOUTH SAN JOAQUIN IRRIGATION DISTRICT

13
14
15
Dated: January 12, 2012
16

KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of the State of California

17
By: CLIFFORD T. LEE
___________________________________
CLIFFORD T. LEE
CECILIA L. DENNIS
ALLISON GOLDSMITH
Deputies Attorney General
Attorneys for Plaintiff Intervenor CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

18
19
20
21
22
23

Dated: January 12, 2012

IGNANCIA S. MORENO, Assistant Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
Environment & Natural Resources Division
SETH M. BARSKY, Section Chief

24
25
26
27

By: BRIDGET KENNEDY MCNEIL
___________________________________
BRIDGET KENNEDY MCNEIL, Trial Attorney
Wildlife and Marine Resources Section
Attorneys for FEDERAL DEFENDANTS

28
10
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CVP AND SWP OPERATIONS IN 2012

(1:09-CV-1053 OWW DLB)

1

ORDER
Good cause appearing, and based on the stipulation of the parties, the court hereby orders as

2
3

follows:

4

1.

5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the Joint

Stipulation Regarding CVP And SWP Operations in 2012 is approved.
2.

6

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that all actions in the

7

Joint Stipulation Regarding CVP And SWP Operations in 2012 be carried out as described

8

therein and that the parties to the stipulation have waived any right to seek relief from this court

9

from such actions through May 31, 2012.
3.

10

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, except as

11

specified in the Joint Stipulation Regarding CVP and SWP Operations in 2012, all parties

12

otherwise retain rights to seek further relief to the extent permitted by law.

13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

16

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

January 17, 2012

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:

17
b9ed48bb

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CVP AND SWP OPERATIONS IN 2012

(1:09-CV-1053 OWW DLB)