Martin v. Vasquez et al

Filing 17

ORDER adopting 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Plaintiff's 5 , 16 Request for Injunctive Relief Without Prejudice signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 11/24/2009. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Lance R. Martin ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302. On November 3, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Findings and Recommendations on November 20, 2009. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. // // 1 v. L. M. VASQUEZ, et al., (Docs. 5, 16) Defendants. / LANCE R. MARTIN, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01081-OWW-DLB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF WITHOUT PREJUDICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on November 3, 2009, is adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief, filed on July 6, 2009, is denied without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 24, 2009 emm0d6 /s/ Oliver W. Wanger UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?