Rios v. Phillips, et al.
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendant's 12 MOTION to DISMISS; Plaintiff's Response Due Not Later Than August 31, 2010 signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/28/2010. (Bradley, A)
(PC) Rios v. Phillips, et al.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ROBERT RIOS, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 BRIAN PHILLIPS, et al., 12 Defendant. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. 1:09-cv-1116-MJS (PC) ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 12) / PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE DUE NOT LATER THAN AUGUST 31, 2010 On June 16, 2010, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 12]. By local rule, Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days. Local Rule 78-230(m). The Court has yet to receive any response from Plaintiff. Plaintiff is directed to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss not later than August 31, 2010. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this action will be dismissed for failure to obey the Court's order and failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ci4d6 July 28, 2010 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Michael J. Seng
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?