Labes v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

Filing 4

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 3 Motion to Proceed IFP; INFORMATIONAL ORDER to Plaintiff Regarding Service, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/16/2009. The Court will consider whether or not to direct the Clerk to issue the summons and the Marshal to serve the complaint only after the Court has screened the complaint. (Sondheim, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with an action for damages and other relief concerning alleged civil rights violations. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304. By application filed on July 7, 2009, Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis IS GRANTED. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). The Court will consider whether or not to direct the Clerk to issue the summons and the Marshal to serve the complaint only after the Court has screened the complaint to determine whether 1 RAYMOND MARK LABES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, et ) al., ) Defendants. ) ) ) 1:09-cv-01172-LJO-SMS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. 3) INFORMATIONAL ORDER TO PLAINTIFF REGARDING SERVICE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the case is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Because of the large number of pending matters before it, the Court will screen Plaintiff's complaint in due course. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 July 16, 2009 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?