Rodriguez v. City of Fresno et al
Filing
99
**STRICKEN PER ORDER 101 ** ORDER Correcting Clerical Error Nunc Pro Tunc Re: Order on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment OR Summary Adjudication, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/25/11. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CITY OF FRESNO, JERRY DYER
)
ROBERT CHAVEZ, and DOES 1 to 20, )
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________ )
GABRIELLE RODRIGUEZ,
CV F 09- CV - 1176 AWI MJS
ORDER CORRECTING
CLERICAL ERROR NUNC
PRO TUNC RE: ORDER ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR
SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
Correcting Document # 96
16
17
18
19
In this action, the court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment by order
20
filed on May 16, 2011 (the “May 16 Order”). In the May 16 Order, the court intended to
21
grant judgment in favor of Plaintiff as to Plaintiff’s first, second, fifth and sixth claims for
22
relief. As to Plaintiff’s remaining claims for relief numbered third, fourth, seventh and
23
eighth, the court declined to exercise supplementary jurisdiction and intended to dismiss
24
these claims without prejudice. The parties have pointed out that clerical errors were entered
25
into the court’s orders at items numbered 5 and 6 on page 22 of the court’s May 16 Order.
26
27
THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the
28
court hereby ORDERS that the court’s May 16 Order is hereby CORRECTED NUNC PRO
1
TUNC as to the court’s orders numbered 5 and 6 on page 22 of Document Number 96 as
2
follows:
3
5.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff’s fifth claim for relief for
4
violation of section 51.7 of the California Civil Code is GRANTED. The clerk of the
5
court shall ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants as to Plaintiff’s fifth claim
6
for relief.
7
6.
Defendants’ sixth claim for relief for violation of section 52.1 of the California Civil
8
Code is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall ENTER JUDGMENT in
9
favor of Defendants’ as to Plaintiff’s sixth claim for relief.
10
7.
11
12
without prejudice.
8.
13
14
Plaintiff’s third, fourth, seventh and eighth claim for relief are hereby DISMISSED
The Clerk of the Court shall CORRECT the Order of Judgment consistent with the
above corrections.
9.
The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE THE CASE.
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Dated:
0m8i78
May 25, 2011
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?