McNally et al v. Eye Dog Foundation for the Blind, Inc. et al

Filing 132

ORDER SETTING a BRIEFING SCHEDULE and a HEARING. Due to Judge Ishii's order regarding supplemental briefing, the following schedule is ORDERED: 1) On or before August 5, 2011, Plaintiffs shall file a supplemental brief on the issue of wh ether Plaintiffs' state law claims are preempted under ERISA; 2) On or before August 12, 2011, Defendants shall file a supplemental brief in response to Plaintiffs' supplemental brief; and 3) On or before August 19, 2011, Plaintiffs may fil e an optional reply brief. In light of Mr. Harrison's Application for Withdrawal, the following schedule is set: 1) The hearing regarding Mr. Harrison's Application for Withdrawal (Doc. 129) is SET for August 31, 2011, 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8, 6th floor, before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto; 2) In addition to Mr. Harrison, Defendant Gwen Brown and at least one representative of Defendants Eye Dog Foundation for the Blind, Inc. and Eye Dog Foundation Profit Sharin g Plan are ORDERED to appear for the August 31, 2011, hearing on behalf of the Defendants; 3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve this order on Defendants Gwen Brown, Eye Dog Foundation for the Blind, Inc., and Eye Dog Foundation Profi t Sharing Plan at Post Office Box 519, Claremont, California, 91711; and 4) Defendants' counsel shall make all reasonable efforts necessary to inform the Defendants of this order. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/27/2011. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MONTRY McNALLY; RUBY BELL; and KENNETH BALES, CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01184-AWI-SKO 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND A HEARING 10 v. 11 12 13 EYE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND, INC.; EYE DOG FOUNDATION PROFIT SHARING PLAN; GWEN BROWN, an individual, and DOES 1 THROUGH 50, (Docs. 129, 131) 14 Defendants. 15 / 16 17 On July 22, 2011, Mr. Harrison, Defendants' counsel, filed an "Ex Parte Application for 18 Withdrawal As Attorney of Record" ("Application for Withdrawal"). (Doc. 129.) On that same day, 19 Chief District Judge Ishii ordered both parties to file supplemental briefs regarding an ERISA 20 preemption issue relevant to Plaintiffs' pending motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 130.) 21 On July 26, 2011, Mr. Harrison filed a statement requesting clarification of Judge Ishii's 22 supplemental briefing order. (Doc. 131.) 23 Supplemental Briefing Schedule: Due to Judge Ishii's order regarding supplemental briefing, the following schedule is 24 25 ORDERED: 1. 26 of whether Plaintiffs' state law claims are preempted under ERISA; 27 28 On or before August 5, 2011, Plaintiffs shall file a supplemental brief on the issue /// 1 2. 2 response to Plaintiffs' supplemental brief; and 3 4 On or before August 12, 2011, Defendants shall file a supplemental brief in 3. On or before August 19, 2011, Plaintiffs may file an optional reply brief. August 31, 2011, Hearing Schedule 5 In light of Mr. Harrison's Application for Withdrawal, the following schedule is set: 6 1. The hearing regarding Mr. Harrison's Application for Withdrawal (Doc. 129) is SET 7 for August 31, 2011, 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8, 6th floor, before Magistrate 8 Judge Sheila K. Oberto; 2. 9 In addition to Mr. Harrison, Defendant Gwen Brown and at least one representative 10 of Defendants Eye Dog Foundation for the Blind, Inc. and Eye Dog Foundation 11 Profit Sharing Plan are ORDERED to appear for the August 31, 2011, hearing on 12 behalf of the Defendants; 13 3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve this order on Defendants Gwen Brown, 14 Eye Dog Foundation for the Blind, Inc., and Eye Dog Foundation Profit Sharing 15 Plan at Post Office Box 519, Claremont, California, 91711; and 4. 16 Defendants' counsel shall make all reasonable efforts necessary to inform the Defendants of this order. 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: ie14hj July 27, 2011 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?