McNally et al v. Eye Dog Foundation for the Blind, Inc. et al

Filing 151

STIPULATION and ORDER for Release of Funds in the Eye Dog Foundation Profit Sharing Plan, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/30/2011. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Robert L. Sullivan, Jr., # 41711 Devon R. McTeer, #230539 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP P.O. Box 28912 5 River Park Place East Fresno, CA 93720-1501 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 (SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) Attorneys for Plaintiffs MONTRY MCNALLY; RUBY BELL; and KENNETH BALES 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 MONTRY MCNALLY; RUBY BELL; and KENNETH BALES, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS IN THE EYE DOG FOUNDATION PROFIT SHARING PLAN v. EYE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND, INC.; EYE DOG FOUNDATION PROFIT SHARING PLAN; GWEN BROWN, an individual, and DOES 1 through 50, Defendants. 18 19 Case No. 1:09-CV-01184-AWI-SKO THE PARTIES TO THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED ACTION, BY AND THROUGH THEIR UNDERSIGNED COUNSEL OF RECORD, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 1. That on May 4, 2010, Plaintiff MONTRY MCNALLY, RUBY BELL and KENNETH BALES (hereafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”) filed a Motion For a Preliminary Injunction with this Court to freeze the assets in the Morgan Stanley accounts relating to the EYE DOG FOUNDATION PROFIT SHARING PLAN (hereafter referred to as the “the PLAN”). By way of their Motion, Plaintiffs asked this Court to enjoin and restrain Defendants EYE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND, INC., EYE DOG FOUNDATION PROFIT SHARING PLAN and GWEN BROWN (hereafter collectively referred to as 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 R IVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS 1 “Defendants”) and their officers, agents, employees, representatives, and all persons acting in 2 concert or participating with them, during the pendency of this action, from withdrawing from 3 Morgan Stanley account numbers 238 133040 350 and 238 133040 165, or any other accounts 4 relating to the PLAN. 5 2. On May 28, 2010, the Court issued an order granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for a 6 Preliminary Injunction ordering that a preliminary injunction should be issued to freeze the assets 7 in the Morgan Stanley accounts relating to the PLAN. 8 3. On September 26, 2011, the parties entered into a settlement agreement after a 9 settlement conference was held before Magistrate Sheila K. Oberto. Pursuant to the settlement, 10 Defendants agreed to distribute to Plaintiffs, who are beneficiaries under the PLAN, the full 11 amount of benefits owed to their sister, Lequita McKay, a participant in the PLAN. As of April 12 30, 2011, Lequita McKay’s total interest in the PLAN was $252,723.35. (Attached hereto as 13 Exhibit “A” is a true and correct copy of a September 28, 2011 fax from Stephanie Copner at 14 Retirement Plan Consultants attaching the Participant Account Statement for Lequita McKay 15 reflecting the total balance of $252,723.35.) 16 4. Due to the above-referenced settlement agreement, it is now necessary to distribute 17 Lequita McKay’s interest in the PLAN to her beneficiaries. The parties hereby agree that, within 18 30 days from the date in which the Court issues an Order and prior to the unfreezing of the 19 Morgan Stanley accounts at issue, a cashiers check shall be distributed directly from Morgan 20 Stanley to Plaintiffs MONTRY MCNALLY, RUBY BELL and KENNETH BALES in the 21 amount of $252,723.35. Said check will be delivered to Plaintiffs’ counsel, in care of Robert L. 22 Sullivan at McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth at 5 River Park Place East, Fresno, 23 California 93720. 24 5. After the funds are released directly from Morgan Stanley to Plaintiffs, the 25 remainder of the account which includes the PLAN assets will be unfrozen and the preliminary 26 injunction will be vacated. Until such time as the cashier’s check is distributed to Plaintiffs, no 27 funds shall be withdrawn from the Morgan Stanley accounts. 28 \\\ MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 R IVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS 1 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP Dated: September 30, 2011 2 3 By: /s/ Devon R. McTeer Devon R. McTeer Robert L. Sullivan, Jr. Attorneys for Plaintiffs, MONTRY MCNALLY; RUBY BELL; and KENNETH BALES 4 5 6 7 Dated: September 30, 2011 By: /s/ Ralph E. Harrison II Ralph E. Harrison II Attorney for Defendants, EYE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND, INC.; EYE DOG FOUNDATION PROFIT SHARING PLAN; and GWEN BROWN 8 9 10 11 ORDER 12 13 After full consideration of the terms of the stipulation by the parties as set forth above, this Court, being fully advised, and good cause appearing, makes the following order: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 It is ordered that, within 30 days of the date of this Order and prior to the unfreezing of the Morgan Stanley accounts at issue, a cashiers check in the amount of $252,723.35, shall be distributed in the name of MONTRY MCNALLY, RUBY BELL, and KENNETH BALES, in care of their attorney Robert L. Sullivan at the law offices of McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, located at 5 River Park Place East, Fresno, California 93720. After the funds are released from Morgan Stanley to Plaintiffs, the preliminary injunction will be vacated and the remainder of the account will be unfrozen. Until such time as the cashier’s check is distributed to Plaintiffs, no funds shall be withdrawn from the Morgan Stanley accounts. 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: September 30, 2011 26 27 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 0m8i788 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 R IVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?