National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Burton Olson Trucking Company et al

Filing 24

ORDER denying stipulated request for modification to scheduling order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/10/2010. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Burton Olson Trucking Company et al Doc. 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Plaintiffs, 9 v. 10 11 12 13 14 On November 9, 2010, the parties filed a stipulation requesting that the discovery deadlines 15 set forth in the November 9, 2009, Scheduling Order be extended. (Doc. 22.) In the November 9, 16 2009, Scheduling Order, the parties were explicitly instructed as follows: 17 18 19 (Doc. 18.) 20 The parties' stipulated request provides no statement of good cause or even a reason why the 21 deadlines applicable to discovery should be extended. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties' request for an extension of 23 discovery deadlines is DENIED without prejudice. The parties may resubmit a request that states 24 good cause for the desired extensions. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: ie14hj November 10, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause for granting the relief requested. BURTON OLSON TRUCKING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. / AMTRAK, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01190-OWW-SKO ORDER DENYING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULING ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?