Tucker v. Hartley

Filing 6

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/14/2009. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. Response to Petition due by 9/15/2009. (Sant Agata, S)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden 13 Respondent. 14 15 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 17 The Court has conducted a preliminary review of the Petition. It is not clear from the face 18 of the Petition whether Petitioner is entitled to relief. 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Accordingly, pursuant to 19 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil 20 21 1. 22 of the date of service of this order. See Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 23 24 25 26 27 28
T h e Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "apply to proceedings for habeas corpus ... to the extent that the p r a c tic e in those proceedings (A) is not specified in a federal statute, the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, or the R u le s Governing Section 2255 Cases; and (B) has previously conformed to the practice in civil actions." Fed.R.Civ.P. 81(a)(4). Rule 11 also provides "[t]he Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to the extent that they are not in c o n s is te n t with any statutory provision or these rules, may be applied to a proceeding under these rules." Rule 11, R u l e s Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondent is advised that a scanned copy of the Petition is available in the Court's electronic case filing s y s t e m ("CM/ECF").
2 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

JEROME TUCKER, Petitioner, v.

1:09-cv-01199-DLB (HC) ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO FILE RESPONSE ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO SERVE DOCUMENTS ON ATTORNEY GENERAL /

Procedure,1 the Court HEREBY ORDERS: Respondent SHALL FILE a RESPONSE to the Petition2 within SIXTY (60) days

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. 2.

Cases; Cluchette v. Rushen, 770 F.2d 1469, 1473-1474 (9th Cir. 1985) (court has discretion to fix time for filing a response). A Response can be made by filing one of the following: A. AN ANSWER addressing the merits of the Petition. Respondent SHALL INCLUDE with the Answer any and all transcripts or other documents necessary for the resolution of the issues presented in the Petition. See Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Any argument by Respondent that Petitioner has procedurally defaulted a claim SHALL BE MADE in the ANSWER, but must also address the merits of the claim asserted. B. A MOTION TO DISMISS the Petition. A Motion to Dismiss SHALL INCLUDE copies of all Petitioner's state court filings and dispositive rulings. See Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.3 If Respondent files an Answer to the Petition, Petitioner MAY FILE a Traverse within THIRTY (30) days of the date Respondent's Answer is filed with the Court. If no Traverse is filed, the Petition and Answer are deemed submitted at the expiration of the thirty days. If Respondent files a Motion to Dismiss, Petitioner SHALL FILE an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition within THIRTY (30) days of the date Respondent's Motion is filed with the Court. If no Opposition is filed, the Motion to Dismiss is deemed submitted at the expiration of the thirty days. Any Reply to an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss SHALL be filed within EIGHT (8) days, plus three days for mailing.

R u le 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides that upon the court's determination that s u m m a r y dismissal is inappropriate, the "judge must order the respondent to file an answer or other pleading . . . or to take other action the judgemay order ." Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (emphasis added); see also A d v is o r y Committee Notes to Rule 4 and 5 of Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (stating that a dismissal may o b v i a t e the need for filing an answer on the substantive merits of the petition and that the Attorney General may file a Motion to Dismiss for failure to exhaust.); W h ite v. Lewis , 874 F.2d 599, 60203 (9th Cir. 1989) (providing that M o tio n s to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 4 are proper in a federal habeas proceeding.)

3

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3b142a 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

4.

Unless already submitted, both Respondent and Petitioner SHALL COMPLETE and RETURN to the Court within THIRTY (30) days a Consent/Decline form indicating whether the party consents or declines to consent to the jurisdiction of a the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).

5.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to SERVE a copy of this order on the Attorney General or his representative.

All motions shall be submitted on the record and briefs filed without oral argument unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Local Rule 78-230(h). Extensions of time will only be granted upon a showing of good cause. All provisions of Local Rule 11-110 are applicable to this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:

July 14, 2009

/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

3