Hill v. Mimms, et al

Filing 22

ORDER DISCHARGING 16 Order to Show Cause; GRANTING Extension of Time Nunc Pro Tunc to December 21, 2010; and DIRECTING Clerk to File Answer That is Attached to 19 Declaration, Nunc Pro Tunc to December 21, 2010, and Correct Court Records, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 12/23/2010. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
-SMS (PC) Hill v. Aw Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 / 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT RAYMOND HILL, Plaintiff, v. T. AW, Defendant. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01202-LJO-SMS PC ORDER (1) DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; (2) GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME NUNC PRO TUNC TO DECEMBER 21, 2010; AND (3) DIRECTING CLERK'S OFFICE TO FILE ANSWER NUNC PRO TUNC TO DECEMBER 21, 2010, AND CORRECT COURT RECORDS (Docs. 16 and 19) Plaintiff Raymond Hill, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 13, 2009. On December 9, 2010, the Court ordered Defendant Ah to show cause why default should not be entered against him for failure to file a response to Plaintiff's amended complaint. Defendant filed a response on December 21, 2010, along with a request for an extension of time and an answer to the amended complaint. Having considered Defendant's request, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. The order to show cause is discharged; Defendant's request for an extension of time is granted nunc pro tunc to December 21, 2010; 3. The Clerk's Office shall file in the answer attached to document 19 nunc pro tunc to December 21, 2010; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. The Clerk's Office shall (1) change court records to correctly identify Defendant Ah as Defendant T. Aw and (2) change the title of this action from Hill v. Mimms, et al. to Hill v. Aw. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: i0d3h8 December 23, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?