Pollard v. Harrington

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and DENYING 14 Plaintiff's Motion to Order Defendants to Reissue Plaintiff's Personal Property, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/1/2010. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Pollard v. Harrington Doc. 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Jerry Emanuel Pollard, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 27, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation herein which was served on Plaintiff and contained notice to Plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and Recommendation was to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 22.) More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not filed an Objection. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. /// /// /// /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JERRY EMANUEL POLLARD, Plaintiff, v. K. HARRINGTON, Defendant. / CASE NO. 1:09-cv-1232-LJO-MJS (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (ECF No. 14) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: b9ed48 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. The Findings and Recommendation, filed July 27, 2010, is adopted in full; Plaintiff's Motions to Order Defendants to Reissue Plaintiff's Personal Property (ECF No. 14) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. September 1, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?