Belcher v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
38
STIPULATED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - Defendant shall respond to plaintiff's supplemental application for attorneys' fees by 7/5/2011. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/1/2011. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BENJAMIN B.WAGNER
United States Attorney
LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
CYNTHIA B. DE NARDI, CSBN 256770
Special Assistant United States Attorney
333 Market Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94105-2102
Telephone: (415) 977-8961
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: cynthia.denardi@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
JOHN BELCHER,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
18
19
Defendant.
) Case No. 1:09-cv-01234-DLB
)
) STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
20
21
22
23
24
25
The parties hereby stipulate by counsel, with the Court’s approval as indicated by
issuance of the attached Order, that Defendant shall have a first 30-day extension of time to
respond to Plaintiff’s Supplemental Application for Attorneys’ Fees Under the Equal Access to
Justice Act, filed May 3, 2011. The current due date is June 2, 2011. The new due date will be
July 5, 2011 .
26
27
28
1
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
3
Dated: June 1, 2011
/s/ Sengthiene Bosavanh
(As authorized via telephone by R. Gonzalez)
SENGTHIENE BOSAVANH
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: June 1, 2011
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
/s/ Cynthia B. De Nardi
12
CYNTHIA B. DE NARDI
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
13
14
15
ORDER
16
17
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
Dated:
21
22
23
/s/ Dennis
June 1, 2011
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
3b142a
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?