Belcher v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 38

STIPULATED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - Defendant shall respond to plaintiff's supplemental application for attorneys' fees by 7/5/2011. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/1/2011. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BENJAMIN B.WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration CYNTHIA B. DE NARDI, CSBN 256770 Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105-2102 Telephone: (415) 977-8961 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: cynthia.denardi@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 JOHN BELCHER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 18 19 Defendant. ) Case No. 1:09-cv-01234-DLB ) ) STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 20 21 22 23 24 25 The parties hereby stipulate by counsel, with the Court’s approval as indicated by issuance of the attached Order, that Defendant shall have a first 30-day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Supplemental Application for Attorneys’ Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, filed May 3, 2011. The current due date is June 2, 2011. The new due date will be July 5, 2011 . 26 27 28 1 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 3 Dated: June 1, 2011 /s/ Sengthiene Bosavanh (As authorized via telephone by R. Gonzalez) SENGTHIENE BOSAVANH Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: June 1, 2011 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 /s/ Cynthia B. De Nardi 12 CYNTHIA B. DE NARDI Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 13 14 15 ORDER 16 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: 21 22 23 /s/ Dennis June 1, 2011 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: 3b142a 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?