Arredondo, et al. vs. Delano Farms Company, et al.

Filing 297

STIPULATION and ORDER Regarding Mediation Scheduling and Oral Argument on Motion for Decertification. Deadline for mediation: June 21, 2013, Parties to Advise Court of outcome of mediation: June 24, 2013., Oral Argument on defendants' pending motions: July 19, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng in Courtroom 6 (MJS), Fresno Courthouse, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 05/30/2013. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
1 The Honorable Michael J. Seng 2 3 4 5 6 LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY William C. Hahesy State Bar No. 105743 225 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 105 Fresno, CA 93704 Telephone: (559) 579-1230 Facsimile: (559) 579-1231 7 8 Attorneys for DELANO FARMS COMPANY 12 SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP David N. Bruce Miles A. Yanick 1425 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800 Seattle, Washington 98101 Telephone: (206) 749-0500 Facsimile: (206) 749-0600 13 Attorneys for DELANO FARMS COMPANY 9 10 11 Pro Hac Vice Pro Hac Vice 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AT FRESNO 15 16 17 18 SABAS ARREDONDO, JOSE CUEVAS, HILARIO GOMEZ, IRMA LANDEROS, and ROSALBA LANDEROS individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 19 Plaintiffs, 20 v. 21 22 23 NO. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION SCHEDULING AND ORAL ARGUMENT ON MOTION FOR DECERTIFICATION DELANO FARMS COMPANY, a Washington State Corporation; CAL-PACIFIC FARM MANAGEMENT, L.P.; T&R BANGI'S AGRICULTURAL SERVICES, INC., and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 24 25 26 27 Defendants. I. STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION The parties have diligently pursued arrangements for mediation since appearing for a STIPULATION AN ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION SCHEDULING AND ORAL ARGUMENT ON MOTION FOR DECERTIFICATION - 1 No. 1:09-cv-01247 SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP 1425 Fourth Avenue Suite 800 Seattle, Washington 98101-2272 (206) 749-0500 1 Status Conference with Judge Boone, and now have identified a mediator acceptable to all 2 parties and have scheduled mediation with that mediator for June 21, 2013, the first date on 3 which all necessary counsel, parties, and the mediator are available. The parties note that this mediation is several weeks after the deadline for mediation 4 5 (May 31, 2013) established by Judge Boone, and only a few days prior to the date currently set 6 for oral argument of defendants’ motions to decertify and for a trial plan. 7 The parties therefore respectfully request and suggest that this Court (a) extend the 8 deadline for mediation to June 21, 2013, and (b) re-schedule oral argument on defendants’ 9 pending motions, as jointly stipulated to and requested below. The requesting scheduling 10 adjustments may facilitate the non-judicial resolution of this matter and, should mediation fail, 11 will allow the Court adequate time for review of the submittals on the pending motion prior to 12 oral argument. The parties to the above-captioned matter, through their respective counsel of record, 13 14 hereby stipulate to and jointly request the following dates for mediation and for oral argument 15 on the pending motions: 16 June 21, 2013 Deadline for mediation 17 June 24, 2013 Parties to advise Court of outcome of mediation July 19, 2013, 9:30 am Oral argument on defendants’ pending motions 18 19 SO STIPULATED: 20 21 SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP 22 23 24 GRISWOLD, LASALLE, COBB, DOWD & GIN, LLP By /s/ David N. Bruce David N. Bruce, Pro Hac Vice Miles A. Yanick, Pro Hac Vice By /s/ Michael R. Johnson Michael R. Johnson, State Bar No. 237767 25 Attorneys for Delano Farms Company 26 27 Attorneys for Cal-Pacific Farm Management, L.P., and T&R Bangi’s Agicultural Services, Inc. STIPULATION AN ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION SCHEDULING AND ORAL ARGUMENT ON MOTION FOR DECERTIFICATION - 2 No. 1:09-cv-01247 SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP 1425 Fourth Avenue Suite 800 Seattle, Washington 98101-2272 (206) 749-0500 1 2 3 LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY LAW OFFICES OF MARCOS CAMACHO By By 4 5 /s/ William C. Hahesy William C. Hahesy, State Bar No. 105743 Attorneys for Delano Farms Company 6 7 II. /s/ Mario G. Martinez Mario G. Martinez, State Bar No. 200721 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sabas Arredondo, et al [PROPOSED] ORDER Presented by: 8 SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP 9 By 11 /s/ David N. Bruce David N. Bruce, Pro Hac Vice Miles A. Yanick, Pro Hac Vice 12 Attorneys for Delano Farms Company 10 13 LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY 14 15 By /s/ William C. Hahesy William C. Hahesy, State Bar No. 105743 16 Attorneys for Delano Farms Company 17 18 19 GRISWOLD, LASALLE, COBB, DOWD & GIN, LLP By 20 21 22 23 /s/ Michael R. Johnson Michael R. Johnson, State Bar No. 237767 Attorneys for Cal-Pacific Farm Management, L.P., and T&R Bangi’s Agicultural Services, Inc. LAW OFFICES OF MARCOS CAMACHO 24 25 By /s/ Mario G. Martinez Mario G. Martinez, State Bar No. 200721 26 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sabas Arredondo, et al 27 STIPULATION AN ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION SCHEDULING AND ORAL ARGUMENT ON MOTION FOR DECERTIFICATION - 3 No. 1:09-cv-01247 SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP 1425 Fourth Avenue Suite 800 Seattle, Washington 98101-2272 (206) 749-0500 1 ORDER 2 Based on the foregoing stipulation, the Court hereby orders that the parties in 3 action NO.1:09- cv-01247-MJS shall observe the following dates for mediation and for oral 4 5 argument on the pending motions: 6 June 21, 2013 Deadline for mediation 7 June 24, 2013 Parties to advise Court of outcome of mediation 8 July 19, 2013, 9:30 am Oral argument on defendants’ pending motions 9 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 17 Dated: May 30, 2013 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: ci4d6 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATION AN ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION SCHEDULING AND ORAL ARGUMENT ON MOTION FOR DECERTIFICATION - 4 No. 1:09-cv-01247 SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP 1425 Fourth Avenue Suite 800 Seattle, Washington 98101-2272 (206) 749-0500

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?