Arredondo, et al. vs. Delano Farms Company, et al.

Filing 317

Stipulation Between the Parties Concerning Clarifications of the Court's March 21, 2014 Order and Order Thereon, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 04/01/2014. (Yu, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 David N. Bruce, Pro Hac Vice Miles A. Yanick, Pro Hac Vice Sarah Gohmann Bigelow, Pro Hac Vice SAVITT, BRUCE & WILLEY, LLP 1425 Fourth Avenue, Suite 800 Seattle, WA 98101-2272 Telephone: (206) 749-0500 Facsimile: (206) 749-0600 Email: dbruce@jetcitylaw.com myanick@jetcitylaw.com sgohmannbigelow@jetcitylaw.com William C. Hahesy, #105743 LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY 225 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 105 Fresno, CA 93704 Telephone (559) 579-1230 Facsimile (559) 579-1231 Email: bill@hahesylaw.com Attorneys for Defendant DELANO FARMS COMPANY 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 SABAS ARREDONDO, JOSE CUEVAS, HILARIO GOMEZ, IRMA LANDEROS, and ROSALBA LANDEROS individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:09-cv-01247 MJS STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES CONCERNING CLARIFICATION OF THE COURT’S MARCH 21, 2014 ORDER AND ORDER THEREON DELANO FARMS COMPANY, a Washington State Corporation; CALPACIFIC FARM MANAGEMENT, L.P.; T&R BANGI’S AGRICULTURAL SERVICES, INC., and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 24 STIPULATION 25 The Plaintiffs Sabas Arredondo, Jose Cuevas, Hilario Gomez, Irma Landeros, and 26 Rosalba Landeros and Defendants Delano Farms Company, a Washington State Corporation; 27 Cal-Pacific Farm Management, L.P., and T&R Bangi’s Agricultural Services, Inc., by and 28 through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: K:\MJS\1. To_Be_Reviewed_By_MJS\09cv1247.stip.to.clarify.doc 1 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPIULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES CONCERNING CLARIFICATION OF THE COURT’S MARCH 21, 2014 ORDER AND ORDER THEREON 1 The Court entered an order dated March 21, 2014 after the scheduling conference. (Dkt. 2 315.) The Order currently provides that the Court orders the parties to “engage and designate 3 experts to assist with formulation of discovery and trial plan by April 4, 2014.” (See Dkt. 315.) 4 The parties execute this stipulation and propose the below order to the Court to provide that the 5 parties will engage their experts by April 4, 2014 to assist in the formulation of discovery and a 6 trial plan, but not formally designate experts in any manner. The parties anticipate that the 7 designation of experts will occur at a date subsequently set by the Court. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 The parties respectfully request that the Court enter the Order as set forth below. SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP GRISWOLD, LASALLE, COBB, DOWD & GIN, LLP By __/s/ Miles A. Yanick___________ David N. Bruce, Pro Hac Vice Miles A. Yanick, Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Defendant, Delano Farms Company By ___/s/ Michael R. Johnson____________ Michael R. Johnson Attorneys for Defendants, Cal-Pacific Farm Management, L.P., and T&R Bangi’s Agricultural Services, Inc. LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY MYERS, WIDDERS, GIBSON, JONES & FEINGOLD, LLP By __/s/ William C. Hahesy________ William C. Hahesy Attorneys for Defendant, Delano Farms Company By ___/s/ James E. Perero ______________ James E. Perero Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sabas Arredondo, et al. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER The Court having reviewed the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing therefor: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall engage experts to assist with the formulation of discovery and trial plan by April 4, 2014. Any formal designation of experts shall occur at a date to be set later by the Court. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: April 1, 2014 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE K:\MJS\1. To_Be_Reviewed_By_MJS\09cv1247.stip.to.clarify.doc 2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPIULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES CONCERNING CLARIFICATION OF THE COURT’S MARCH 21, 2014 ORDER AND ORDER THEREON 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 K:\MJS\1. To_Be_Reviewed_By_MJS\09cv1247.stip.to.clarify.doc 3 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPIULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES CONCERNING CLARIFICATION OF THE COURT’S MARCH 21, 2014 ORDER AND ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?