Arredondo, et al. vs. Delano Farms Company, et al.
Filing
492
STIPULATION and ORDER RE CLASS NOTICE, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/15/2017. (Lafata, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AT FRESNO
8
9
10
11
SABAS ARREDONDO, JOSE CUEVAS,
HILARIO GOMEZ, IRMA LANDEROS, and
ROSALBA LANDEROS individually, and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
12
NO.
1:09-cv-01247-MJS
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
CLASS NOTICE
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
DELANO FARMS COMPANY, a Washington
State Corporation; CAL-PACIFIC FARM
MANAGEMENT, L.P.; T&R BANGI'S
AGRICULTURAL SERVICES, INC., and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
I.
STIPULATION
Pursuant to paragraphs 56 and 57 of the Joint Stipulation of Settlement of Class Actions
21
(“Settlement”) (EFC No. 463-1, Ex. 1) and the Court’s Order of Certification of Settlement
22
Class and Preliminary Approval of Joint Stipulation of Settlement of Class Actions (ECF No.
23
484), the parties and the settlement administrator, KCC, have compiled the Class Data List,
24
identified mailing addresses for the Settlement Class Members, and calculated Anticipated
25
Settlement Shares. Under paragraph 58.a of the Settlement and the Court’s Scheduling Order
26
(ECF No. 488), KCC is to complete the First Mailing of Class Notice by May 16, 2017. Due to
27
delays in finalizing the documents to be mailed, however, KCC will not be able to complete the
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CLASS NOTICE - 1
No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS
1
2
mailing before May 19, 2017.
Accordingly, the parties stipulate and jointly request that the Deadline for the
3
Settlement Administrator to disseminate Class Notice (“First Mailing”) per ¶ 58.a of Settlement
4
as set forth in the Scheduling Order be modified to May 19. It is expected that this will not
5
necessitate a change in any other deadlines or in the date of the Fairness and Approval Hearing.
6
The parties and KCC also have made slight modifications to the Class Notice
7
documents in the process of finalizing them. Other than the correction of typos, formatting
8
changes, completing the blanks in the approved Class Notice documents to provide specific
9
dates and contact information, and other insignificant changes (such as referring to “daytime”
10
and “evening” phone numbers rather than “work” and “home”), the following changes have
11
been made to the following documents:
12
Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement
13
phone number and website, to use in having questions addressed.
14
15
Settlement Class Members are now provided with an email address, in addition to a
In the response to Question 16, Jose Cuevas’s enhancement payment amount was
16
increased from $2,000 to $7,000 and the total enhancement payment to the Class
17
Representatives was increased from $32,000 to $37,000. (See ECF Nos. 480 at 3:1-
18
4 and 484 at ¶ 1(e).) In the response to Question 15, the Net Settlement Fund was
19
reduced from $3,454,823.72 to $3,449,823.72 to reflect the revised estimated
20
enhancement payments.
21
Claim Form
22
Where more than one unique name appeared in the payroll records for the same
23
Settlement Class Member, the Claim Form previously included a table showing the
24
work weeks counted for each of the different names in calculating the Settlement
25
Class Member’s Anticipated Settlement Share. The table also included a space for
26
Employee Identification Numbers. This table was deemed to be potentially
27
confusing and not likely to be useful and thus was removed. However, the Claim
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CLASS NOTICE - 2
No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS
1
Form still identifies the unique names believed to be associated with each
2
Settlement Class Member and included in calculating his or her anticipated
3
settlement share and states the total number of work weeks deemed to have been
4
worked by that Settlement Class Member in each Class Period.
5
Settlement Class Members are now provided with an email address, in addition to a
6
phone number and website, to use in challenging their Anticipated Settlement
7
Shares.
8
9
The estimated Net Settlement Fund has been reduced from $3,454,823.72 to
$3,449,823.72 to reflect the $7,000 payment to Mr. Cuevas. (See ECF Nos. 480 at
10
3:1-4 and 484 at ¶ 1(e)). For the same reason, the estimated payments to the
11
Representative Plaintiffs has been increased from $32,000 to $37,000.
12
The parties hereby stipulate to the above changes and request that the Court approve
13
them. The final, revised versions of the Class Notice documents are attached hereto as Exhibits
14
A (Notice of Certification of Settlement Class and Class Action Settlement and Your Rights), B
15
(Claim Form), and C (Opt-Out Form).
16
17
SO STIPULATED:
SAVITT BRUCE & WILLEY LLP
MCCORMICK BARSTOW LLP
By /s/ David N. Bruce (as authorized on May
15, 2017)
David N. Bruce, Pro Hac Vice
Miles A. Yanick, Pro Hac Vice
By /s/ D. Greg Durbin (as authorized on May 15,
2017)
D. Greg Durbin, State Bar No. 81749
Laura A. Wolfe, State Bar No. 266751
Attorneys for Delano Farms Company
Attorneys for Cal-Pacific Farm Management,
L.P. and T&R Bangi’s Agricultural Services, Inc.
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY
MARTINEZ AGUILASOCHO & LYNCH
By /s/ William C. Hahesy (as authorized on
May 15, 2017)
William C. Hahesy, State Bar No. 105743
By /s/ Mario Martinez (as authorized on May 15,
2017)
Mario Martinez, State Bar No. 200721
Thomas Patrick Lynch, State Bar No.159277
Attorney for Delano Farms Company
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CLASS NOTICE - 3
No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS
II.
1
2
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Deadline for the Settlement Administrator to disseminate
3
Class Notice (“First Mailing”) per ¶ 58.a of Settlement, as set forth in the Scheduling Order, is
4
changed from May 16 to May 19, 2017, and the revised Class Notice forms attached hereto as
5
Exhibits A–C are hereby approved.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
May 15, 2017
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CLASS NOTICE - 4
No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?