Arredondo, et al. vs. Delano Farms Company, et al.

Filing 541

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR RESOLUTION OF ATTORNEYS FEE DISPUTES; Settlement Conference set for 1/9/2018 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone; Moving Papers 1/19/2018; Oppositions 2/5/2018; Replies 2/20/2 018; Evidentiary Hearing set for 3/5/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng; Argument set for 3/13/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/1/2017. (Bernacchi, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SABAS ARREDONDO, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 12 13 14 v. DELANO FARMS COMPANY, et al., Case No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR RESOLUTION OF ATTORNEYS’ FEE DISPUTES Settlement Conference: January 9, 2018 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9 (SAB) Defendants. Moving Papers: January 19, 2018 15 Oppositions: February 5, 2018 16 Replies: February 20, 2018 17 18 19 Evidentiary hearing: March 5, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. (five days reserved) in Courtroom 6 (MJS) Argument: March 13, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6 (MJS) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On December 1, 2018, the matter came before the Court on a scheduling and status conference pertaining to the fee dispute of former and current class counsel. (ECF No. 540.) Mario Martinez, Anna Walther, Gregory Ramirez, Brian York, and William Callaham appeared on behalf of current class counsel. Leonard Comden, Kelton Lee 1 Gibson, and James Perero appeared on behalf of former class counsel. Sarah Bigelow, 2 David Bruce, and Laura Wolfe appeared on behalf of the Defendants. 3 4 5 Given the issues raised by the competing claims to reserved attorney fees in this case, the court Orders as follows: 1. A mandatory Settlement Conference will be convened before the 6 Honorable Stanley A. Boone, U.S. Magistrate Judge, at 10:30 a.m., January 9, 2018, in 7 Courtroom 9, Fresno, and continued, if and as necessary, at the direction of Judge 8 Boone. Judge Boone will issue an Order setting out counsels’ obligations with respect to 9 the Settlement Conference. Counsel are encouraged forthwith to begin meeting and 10 conferring to attempt to narrow the issues needing to be addressed at the Settlement 11 Conference. 12 2. All issues relating to any and all claims to and disputes over attorneys’ fees 13 in this case or their allocation shall be resolved by the Court on motions by counsel and 14 such hearings as the court deems necessary. Counsel with claims to any portion of 15 reserved attorney fees in this case shall present them to the Court by way of motions 16 with supporting briefs, evidence and law and authority. Issues to be addressed shall 17 include, but not be limited to: 18 a. Arbitration. Any counsel or firm claiming that any portion of any 19 dispute relating to fees must be resolved by arbitration shall so move the Court 20 and, in addition to addressing the basis for such claim or claims, shall brief the 21 issue as to who is to decide whether arbitration is required and who is bound to so 22 arbitrate and how such arbitration shall be conducted, and whether testimony 23 must be taken from a witness or witnesses on any of the above issues, and , if so, 24 from whom, why, and how much time will be requested for the testimony of each 25 said witness. 26 27 b. Motion to Strike. Counsel who have briefed the issues raised by the opening motion to strike attorneys’ fees claims (ECF No. 503) may, but are not 28 2 1 required to, supplement their briefing in accordance with the schedule below. . 2 Other counsel may raise or oppose issues in accordance with that schedule. All 3 counsel shall advise the Court whether they feel testimony must be taken from a 4 witness or witnesses to address the issues raised by the motion and, if so, from 5 whom, why, and how much time will be requested for the testimony of each said 6 witness. 7 c. Allocation of Fees. Counsel claiming any portion of the reserved 8 attorney fees shall put forth their proposal for how those fees should be allocated 9 among the various attorney claimants and their authority for same. The Martinez 10 firm shall include a breakout of the portion of fees claimed for work done by 11 Marcos Camacho, the periods of time for which such work was done, and the 12 basis on which Martinez claims to be entitled to any portion of such fees. All 13 counsel shall advise the Court if they feel testimony must be taken from a witness 14 or witnesses to address the issues raised by the motion and, if so, from whom, 15 why, and how much time will be requested for the testimony of each said witness. 16 d. Et cetera. Counsel and parties shall move for any and all other 17 relief related to allocation of fees among counsel and claimed to be appropriate 18 for, and in need of, resolution by the Court on the schedule set forth below. No 19 such motion shall be filed or relief sought after January 19, 2018. 20 3. 21 22 All such issues shall be briefed to the Court and addressed according to the following schedule: a. Moving papers, including supplements (if necessary) to the pending 23 Motion to Strike Claims for Attorney Fees (ECF No. 503), shall be filed and served 24 on or before January 19, 2018. 25 b. Opposition briefs, including supplements (if necessary) to the 26 already filed in opposition to the pending Motion to Strike Claims for Attorney 27 fees, shall be filed on or before February 5, 2018. 28 3 1 c. Reply briefs shall be filed on or before February 20, 2018. 2 d. An evidentiary hearing or hearings to address issues of fact raised 3 by the motions or opposition to them shall be held March 5 through March 9, 4 2018, in Courtroom 6, Fresno, as the court shall hereafter direct. 5 6 e. Oral argument on all motions shall be held on March 13, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6, Fresno, if and as the court directs. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 1, 2017 /s/ 10 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?