Arredondo, et al. vs. Delano Farms Company, et al.
Filing
541
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR RESOLUTION OF ATTORNEYS FEE DISPUTES; Settlement Conference set for 1/9/2018 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone; Moving Papers 1/19/2018; Oppositions 2/5/2018; Replies 2/20/2 018; Evidentiary Hearing set for 3/5/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng; Argument set for 3/13/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/1/2017. (Bernacchi, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
SABAS ARREDONDO, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
11
12
13
14
v.
DELANO FARMS COMPANY, et al.,
Case No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR
RESOLUTION OF ATTORNEYS’ FEE
DISPUTES
Settlement Conference: January 9, 2018 at
10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9 (SAB)
Defendants.
Moving Papers: January 19, 2018
15
Oppositions: February 5, 2018
16
Replies: February 20, 2018
17
18
19
Evidentiary hearing: March 5, 2018 at 9:00
a.m. (five days reserved) in Courtroom 6 (MJS)
Argument: March 13, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. in
Courtroom 6 (MJS)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On December 1, 2018, the matter came before the Court on a scheduling and
status conference pertaining to the fee dispute of former and current class counsel. (ECF
No. 540.) Mario Martinez, Anna Walther, Gregory Ramirez, Brian York, and William
Callaham appeared on behalf of current class counsel. Leonard Comden, Kelton Lee
1
Gibson, and James Perero appeared on behalf of former class counsel. Sarah Bigelow,
2
David Bruce, and Laura Wolfe appeared on behalf of the Defendants.
3
4
5
Given the issues raised by the competing claims to reserved attorney fees in this
case, the court Orders as follows:
1.
A mandatory Settlement Conference will be convened before the
6
Honorable Stanley A. Boone, U.S. Magistrate Judge, at 10:30 a.m., January 9, 2018, in
7
Courtroom 9, Fresno, and continued, if and as necessary, at the direction of Judge
8
Boone. Judge Boone will issue an Order setting out counsels’ obligations with respect to
9
the Settlement Conference. Counsel are encouraged forthwith to begin meeting and
10
conferring to attempt to narrow the issues needing to be addressed at the Settlement
11
Conference.
12
2.
All issues relating to any and all claims to and disputes over attorneys’ fees
13
in this case or their allocation shall be resolved by the Court on motions by counsel and
14
such hearings as the court deems necessary. Counsel with claims to any portion of
15
reserved attorney fees in this case shall present them to the Court by way of motions
16
with supporting briefs, evidence and law and authority. Issues to be addressed shall
17
include, but not be limited to:
18
a.
Arbitration. Any counsel or firm claiming that any portion of any
19
dispute relating to fees must be resolved by arbitration shall so move the Court
20
and, in addition to addressing the basis for such claim or claims, shall brief the
21
issue as to who is to decide whether arbitration is required and who is bound to so
22
arbitrate and how such arbitration shall be conducted, and whether testimony
23
must be taken from a witness or witnesses on any of the above issues, and , if so,
24
from whom, why, and how much time will be requested for the testimony of each
25
said witness.
26
27
b.
Motion to Strike. Counsel who have briefed the issues raised by the
opening motion to strike attorneys’ fees claims (ECF No. 503) may, but are not
28
2
1
required to, supplement their briefing in accordance with the schedule below. .
2
Other counsel may raise or oppose issues in accordance with that schedule. All
3
counsel shall advise the Court whether they feel testimony must be taken from a
4
witness or witnesses to address the issues raised by the motion and, if so, from
5
whom, why, and how much time will be requested for the testimony of each said
6
witness.
7
c.
Allocation of Fees. Counsel claiming any portion of the reserved
8
attorney fees shall put forth their proposal for how those fees should be allocated
9
among the various attorney claimants and their authority for same. The Martinez
10
firm shall include a breakout of the portion of fees claimed for work done by
11
Marcos Camacho, the periods of time for which such work was done, and the
12
basis on which Martinez claims to be entitled to any portion of such fees. All
13
counsel shall advise the Court if they feel testimony must be taken from a witness
14
or witnesses to address the issues raised by the motion and, if so, from whom,
15
why, and how much time will be requested for the testimony of each said witness.
16
d.
Et cetera.
Counsel and parties shall move for any and all other
17
relief related to allocation of fees among counsel and claimed to be appropriate
18
for, and in need of, resolution by the Court on the schedule set forth below. No
19
such motion shall be filed or relief sought after January 19, 2018.
20
3.
21
22
All such issues shall be briefed to the Court and addressed according to
the following schedule:
a.
Moving papers, including supplements (if necessary) to the pending
23
Motion to Strike Claims for Attorney Fees (ECF No. 503), shall be filed and served
24
on or before January 19, 2018.
25
b.
Opposition briefs, including supplements (if necessary) to the
26
already filed in opposition to the pending Motion to Strike Claims for Attorney
27
fees, shall be filed on or before February 5, 2018.
28
3
1
c.
Reply briefs shall be filed on or before February 20, 2018.
2
d.
An evidentiary hearing or hearings to address issues of fact raised
3
by the motions or opposition to them shall be held March 5 through March 9,
4
2018, in Courtroom 6, Fresno, as the court shall hereafter direct.
5
6
e.
Oral argument on all motions shall be held on March 13, 2018 at
10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6, Fresno, if and as the court directs.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 1, 2017
/s/
10
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?