Arredondo, et al. vs. Delano Farms Company, et al.

Filing 548

ORDER re NOTICE OF COURT'S INTENT TO CLOSE CASE, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/24/2018. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SABAS ARREDONDO, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 12 Case No. 1:09-cv-01247-MJS NOTICE OF COURT’S INTENT TO CLOSE CASE v. FOURTEEN DAY RESPONSE DEADLINE 13 14 DELANO FARMS COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 18 On September 29, 2017, the Court entered its final order and judgment in this 19 case, finally resoling all claims by settlement class members against all defendants. 20 (ECF No. 534.) However, the matter remained open pending resolution of an attorney’s 21 fee dispute between former and current class counsel. (See ECF Nos. 503, 533.) The 22 attorney’s fee dispute has now been resolved. (See ECF No. 546.) Thus, it appears that 23 this matter has been resolved in its entirety. 24 Nevertheless, in light of the complexity of the case and the number of parties 25 involved, the Court concludes it is appropriate to provide the parties with notice of its 26 intent to close this case. Any party who believes any aspect of the action remains 27 unresolved and in need of Court attention must so advise this Court within fourteen days 28 1 of the date of this notice. Absent a response to this order showing good cause to do 2 otherwise, this case will be closed. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 24, 2018 /s/ 6 Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?