Johnson v. Gonzalez et al

Filing 117

ORDER Directing Defendants To File A Response To Plaintiff's Motion For Extension Of Time To File An Amended Complaint, Twenty-One Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/29/2014. (Responses due by 10/22/2014) (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY JOHNSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. L. GONZALEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 20 21 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendant Gonzales and Murrieta arising out of an alleged assault following the takedown by Defendant Gonzales on June 9, 2008. On August 22, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file an amended 22 23 Case No.: 1:09-cv-01264-AWI-BAM PC Plaintiff Anthony Johnson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) complaint. Defendants did not respond. Defendants are HEREBY DIRECTED to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s request within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara September 29, 2014 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?