Ivory v. Tilton, et al.
Filing
158
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/26/2013. Telephonic Hearing set for 10/3/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin.(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
NORMAN IVORY,
8
9
10
11
1:09-cv-01272-GSA-PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
vs.
Telephonic Hearing:
October 3, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.
Courtroom 10 (GSA)
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER S. MERAZ,
Defendant.
12
13
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE
14
Norman Ivory (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action
15
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. All parties to this action have voluntarily consented to the
16
jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin, and on September 25, 2013, the case was
17
assigned to Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin for all intents and purposes, within the meaning of
18
28 U.S.C. ' 636(c), to conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including the trial
19
and entry of final judgment. (Doc. 156.) This case is scheduled for trial on October 22, 2013
20
at 8:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin.
21
On September 23, 2013, the court issued a minute order scheduling a telephonic status
22
conference for the parties to this case on September 26, 2013, at 10:30 a.m., before Magistrate
23
Judge Gary S. Austin. (Doc. 155.) The Court is aware that Plaintiff was not properly served
24
with notice of this hearing, however the hearing went ahead as scheduled with the hope that the
25
defendant’s attorney would be able to arrange for Plaintiff’s participation. At the hearing
26
California Deputy Attorney General (DAG) David E. Brice and DAG David C. Goodwin
27
appeared on behalf of Defendant Meraz. Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, did not appear
28
notwithstanding that attempts by defense counsel to gain his appearance were made.
1
1
Defense Counsel, prior to the September 26th hearing, informed the Court that Plaintiff
2
had been released from State prison custody and was no longer incarcerated at High Desert
3
State Prison. Pursuant to Local Rule 183, “[a] party appearing in propria persona shall keep the
4
Court and opposing parties advised as to his or her current address.” L.R. 183(a). Plaintiff has
5
not filed a notice of change of address providing the court with his current address. Thus,
6
Plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(a).
7
Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, with prejudice,
8
for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with Local Rule 183(a). The parties are therefore ordered to
9
appear telephonically on October 3, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., before Magistrate Judge Gary S.
10
Austin, in Courtroom 10. The Court will deliver this notice to both the address of record the
11
Court has on file for Plaintiff, as well to the address supplied to the court by Defendant’s
12
attorney who believes that this address may be where Plaintiff is currently receiving mail.
13
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
14
1.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
The parties shall appear at a telephonic hearing on October 3, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.,
before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin, in Courtroom 10;
2.
Defense counsel shall coordinate a one-line conference call with Plaintiff prior
to calling chambers at (559) 499-5960;
3.
Plaintiff is ordered to show cause at the hearing why this case should not be
dismissed, with prejudice, for his failure to comply with Local Rule 183(a);
4.
The Clerk is directed to serve Plaintiff with copies of this order at the following
two addresses:
(1)
24
Norman Ivory
T-83317
High Desert State Prison
P.O. Box 3030
Susanville, CA 96127-3030
25
and
23
26
27
(2)
Norman Ivory
470 E. Third Street, Suite C
Los Angeles, CA 90013
28
2
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action,
1
5.
2
with prejudice.
3
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
8
9
10
September 26, 2013
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
6i0kij8d
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?