Perinatal Medical Group, Inc., et al. v. Children's Hospital Central CA, Inc.
Filing
93
STIPULATION and ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINES signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/2/2011.(Disclosure of Expert Witnesses: 8/1/2011, Disclosure of Supplemental and/or Rebuttal Expert Witnesses: 8/29/2011, Non-Expert Discovery Deadline: 9/1/2011, Expert Discovery Deadline: 9/27/2011, Non-Dispositive Motion Deadline: 10/1/2011, Non-Dispositive Motion Hearing: On or before 11/4/2011.)(Yu, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY
William C. Hahesy, Esq. – SBN 105743
225 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 105
Fresno, CA 93704
Tel: (559) 579-1230; Fax: (559) 579-1231
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
Charles S. Wright, Esq. – SBN 31940
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200
Seattle, WA 98101-3045
Tel: (206) 622-3150; Fax: (206) 757-7700
Attorneys for Defendant, Children’s Hospital
Central California
9
12
ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO
William M. Woolman, Esq. - SBN 145124
5260 North Palm Avenue, Suite 300
Fresno, CA 93704
Tel: (559) 225-6700; (559) 225-3416
13
Attorneys for Defendant, Specialty Medical Group Central California
10
11
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
PERINATAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC.,
KRISHNAKUMAR RAJANI, M.D., and
STEPHEN ELLIOT, M.D.,
Plaintiffs,
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-1273-LJO-MJS
SECOND STIPULATION
EXTENDING DISCOVERY
DEADLINES
v.
CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL CENTRAL
CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation;
SPECIALTY MEDICAL GROUP CENTRAL
CALIFORNIA, INC., a California professional
medical corporation; and CENTRAL
CALIFORNIA NEONATOLOGY GROUP,
INC., a California professional medical
corporation,
Defendants.
27
28
1
SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINES
I. STIPULATION
1
Plaintiffs PERINATAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., KRISHNAKUMAR RAJANI, M.D.
2
and STEPHEN ELLIOT, M.D. and Defendants CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL CENTRAL
3
CALIFORNIA, SPECIALTY MEDICAL GROUP CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, INC., and
4
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA NEONATOLOGY GROUP, INC., hereinafter collectively referred
5
to as “the parties,” hereby stipulate to the following:
6
1.
Discovery in this matter has been complex, involving numerous parties and third
7
parties.
8
2.
For several months the parties have been exchanging written discovery and
9
working through their discovery disputes in good faith. However, despite the best efforts by the
10
parties and counsel the production by all parties of documents, especially electronically stored
11
information, has taken more time than expected.
12
3.
As a result of mutual delays in document production, the parties had to postpone
13
the start of depositions several months beyond what was originally anticipated. Moreover,
14
despite the best efforts by the parties and counsel scheduling depositions has proven difficult
15
given the professional schedules of various party and non-party witnesses, including numerous
16
physicians. At least 15 depositions have been taken already. At least 24 depositions remain to
17
be taken, not counting expert witnesses.
18
4.
The parties believe a short extension of the pretrial discovery deadlines, and the
19
related deadline for non-dispositive motions, would assist the just, speedy and inexpensive
20
determination of this action. Besides permitting the parties to complete discovery in an orderly,
21
efficient and complete manner, the short extension of approximately 30 days relative to most of
22
the affected deadlines will enable the parties potentially to minimize or reduce additional
23
expenses while the parties determine if they are able to or desire to proceed with potential
24
settlement discussions.
25
5.
26
Therefore, the parties jointly stipulate to the following extensions of the discovery
deadlines set forth in the Court’s scheduling order dated June 29, 2010 [Dkt. 60], as previously
27
28
2
SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINES
1
amended by this Court’s Order On Stipulation Extending Discovery Deadlines dated February
2
11, 2011 [Dkt. 71]:
3
4
5
6
EVENT
Disclosure of Expert Witnesses
Disclosure of Supplemental and/or
Rebuttal Expert Witnesses
Non-Expert Discovery Deadline
Expert Discovery Deadline
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadline
7
8
9
6.
DEADLINE
August 1, 2011
August 29 2011
September 1, 2011
September 27, 2011
Filing: October 1, 2011
Hearing: On or before November 4, 2011
The parties are not requesting any other changes to the Court’s scheduling order.
Specifically, these changes will not affect the dispositive motion deadline or the trial date set
10
forth in the scheduling order.
11
12
13
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
Dated: May 26, 2011
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY
By:
14
15
16
17
Dated: May 26, 2011
s/ William C. Hahesy
William C. Hahesy
Attorneys for Defendant
CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL CENTRAL
CALIFORNIA
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
18
By:
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Dated: May 26, 2011
s/ Charles S. Wright
Charles S. Wright
Attorneys for Defendant
CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL CENTRAL
CALIFORNIA
ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO
By:
s/ William M. Woolman
William M. Woolman
Attorneys for Defendant
SPECIALTY MEDICAL GROUP
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, INC.
26
27
28
3
SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINES
1
Dated: May 26, 2011
DOERKSEN TAYLOR LLP
By:
2
3
4
5
Dated: May 26, 2011
6
FISHMAN, LARSEN, GOLDRING & ZIETLER
By:
7
8
9
10
Dated: May 26, 2011
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Dated: May 26, 2011
s/ Michael W. Goldring
Michael W. Goldring
Attorneys for Defendant
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
NEONATOLOGY GROUP, INC.
CHRISTENSEN & AUER
By:
11
s/ Charles L. Doerksen
Charles L. Doerksen
Attorneys for Defendant
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA
NEONATOLOGY GROUP, INC.
s/ Stephen G. Auer
Stephen G. Auer
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PERINATAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC.,
KRISHNAKAMUR RAJANI, M.D., AND
STEPHEN ELLIOTT, M.D.
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
By:
s/ Darryl J. Horowitt
Darryl J. Horowitt
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PERINATAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC.,
KRISHNAKAMUR RAJANI, M.D., AND
STEPHEN ELLIOTT, M.D.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINES
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
v.
7
9
10
11
12
CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL CENTRAL
CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation;
SPECIALTY MEDICAL GROUP CENTRAL
CALIFORNIA, INC., a California professional
medical corporation; and CENTRAL
CALIFORNIA NEONATOLOGY GROUP,
INC., a California professional medical
corporation,
Defendants.
GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN AND THE PARTIES HAVING
13
14
ORDER ON SECOND
STIPULATION EXTENDING
DISCOVERY DEADLINES
Plaintiffs,
6
8
Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-1273-LJO-MJS
PERINATAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC.,
KRISHNAKUMAR RAJANI, M.D., and
STEPHEN ELLIOT, M.D.,
STIPULATED TO THE SAME, the Court finds that the above-stated SECOND
15
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINES is sanctioned by the
16
17
Court, and, based upon that stipulation,
18
THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
19
1.
The Court’s scheduling order, and first amendment of that order, is hereby
20
21
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
27
///
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINES
1
amended by this second amendment to reflect the parties’ stipulation as follows:
2
3
4
5
6
EVENT
Disclosure of Expert Witnesses
Disclosure of Supplemental and/or
Rebuttal Expert Witnesses
Non-Expert Discovery Deadline
Expert Discovery Deadline
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadline
7
AMENDED DEADLINE
August 1, 2011
August 29 2011
September 1, 2011
September 27, 2011
Filing: October 1, 2011
Hearing: On or before November 4, 2011
8
9
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated:
June 2, 2011
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
13
14
92b0h
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING DISCOVERY DEADLINES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?