Rogers v. Grijalva et al

Filing 34

ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to File Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/27/12. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

RONALD A. ROGERS,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01298-BAM PC
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.
CHRIS GRIJALVA, et al.,

13

(ECF No. 31)

Defendants.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
/

14
15

Plaintiff Ronald A. Rogers (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma

16

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on

17

Plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed May 12, 2010, against Defendants Grijalva, Perez, and

18

Sanzberro for conducting unreasonable searches in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and

19

Defendant Grijalva for excessive force, involuntarily administering medications, and housing

20

Plaintiff in punitive conditions of confinement.

21

On August 10, 2012, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff failed to

22

file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l).

23

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

24

1.

Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants’

25

motion for summary judgment within thirty (30) days from the date of service of

26

this order; and

27

///

28

///
1

1

2.

2

The failure to respond to Defendants’ motion in compliance with this order will
result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411

November 27, 2012

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2