Joe Parks v. Board of Trustees of the California State University et al

Filing 13

ORDER Taking Defendant's re 5 Motion to Dismiss Under Submission signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 9/17/2009. (Figueroa, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants have noticed for hearing and decision a motion to dismiss. The matter was scheduled for hearing to be held on September 28, 2009. Pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(c), Plaintiff was required to file either an opposition or a notice of non-opposition no later than September 14, 2009. Plaintiff has not done so. Due to Plaintiff's failure to file a timely opposition or notice of non-opposition, he is in violation of the Local Rules. See Local Rule 78-230(c). Plaintiff is further not entitled to be heard at oral argument in opposition to the motion. Id. The court has reviewed Defendants' motion and the applicable law, and has determined that the motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 78-230(h). ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ) CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, ) PAUL BEARE, JOHN WELTY, ) JANETTE REDD-WILLIAMS, JANICE ) PARTEN, JERI ECHEVERRIA, and ) DOES 1-50, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) JOE PARKS, 1:09-CV-1314 AWI GSA ORDER TAKING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER SUBMISSION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Therefore, IT IS HERBY ORDERED that the previously set hearing date of September 28, 2009, is VACATED, and no party shall appear at that time. As of September 28, 2009, the court will take the matter under submission, and will thereafter issue its decision. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 September 17, 2009 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?