Samuels v. Adame et al

Filing 94

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Court Clothing, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A Boone on 3/4/13. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ROBERT EARL SAMUELS, CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01320-SAB PC 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COURT CLOTHING 10 v. 11 G. ADAME, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 / 14 15 Plaintiff Robert Earl Samuels (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and 16 in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding 17 on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed December 31, 2009, against Defendants G. Adame, P. 18 Gentry, B. Medrano, R. Nicholas, F. Rivera, E. Sailer, and D. Snyder for excessive force, and against 19 Defendant C. Farnsworth for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the 20 Eighth Amendment. This matter is set for jury trial on March 12, 2013 before the undersigned. 21 22 A telephonic pretrial hearing occurred on March 4, 2013. During the hearing, Plaintiff requested that his family be permitted to send him clothing to wear during trial. Accordingly, 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff’s motion for his family to be permitted to send him appropriate courtroom 25 attire is granted, subject to the security concerns of the California Department of 26 Corrections and Rehabilitation; 27 2. The clothing is to be sent to the following address: 28 1 1 Robert Earl Samuels CDCR No. F-61946 c/o Will Adams, Litigation Coordinator Kern Valley State Prison 3000 West Cecil Avenue Delano, CA 93216 2 3 4 3. 5 The Clerk of the Court is directed to fax a copy of this order to the litigation coordinator at Kern Valley State Prison. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: i1eed4 March 4, 2013 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?