Scott v. Palmer et al

Filing 130

ORDER STRIKING 128 Surreply signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/28/2013. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

FLOYD SCOTT,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01329-LJO-SKO PC
ORDER STRIKING SURREPLY

v.

(Doc. 128)

J. PALMER, et al.,

13

Defendants.
/

14
15
16

On February 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed a surreply relating to Defendants’ motion for
reconsideration, which was filed on January 11, 2013.

17

Plaintiff does not have the right to file a surreply under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

18

or the Local Rules, he did not seek leave of court, and the motion in question was granted on

19

February 24, 2013.

20
21

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s surreply is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record.
Ready Transp., Inc. v. AAR Mfg., Inc., 627 F.3d 402, 404-05 (9th Cir. 2010).

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated:
i0d3h8

February 28, 2013

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
1