Sarmas v. County of Stanislaus et al

Filing 33

ORDER Discharging Order To Show Cause (Doc. 30 ); Order Setting Defendants' Response To Request For Leave, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/29/2011. (Fahrney, E)

Sarmas v. County of Stanislaus et al

Doc. 33

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 / On March 23, 2011, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause to plaintiff's counsel to show good cause in writing why this Court should not impose monetary or other sanctions against plaintiff and/or counsel for failure to comply with the Court's orders. On March 28, 2011, plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause. For good cause shown in the response, this Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. In plaintiff's response, plaintiff requested leave to file a motion to amend the scheduling order and to amend the complaint. Plaintiff argued that the failure of the settlement and the delay in defendants' disclosure of documents, which now raise new potential claims, warrant leave to amend and vacating current dates. Plaintiff requests leave to file the appropriate motions to amend her complaint and to modify the scheduling order. ///// ///// 1 vs. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al, VALINE SARMAS, Plaintiff, CASE NO. CV F 09-1333 LJO DLB ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; ORDER SETTING DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR LEAVE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The pretrial conference is July 6, 2011 and trial is set for September 6, 2011. Defendants shall respond to whether this Court should grant plaintiff's request for leave to file the motions no later than April 6, 2011. Defendants's brief is limited to a maximum of five pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 March 29, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2