Zavala v. Chrones et al

Filing 115

ORDER ADDRESSING Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/26/2012. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KEITH ZAVALA, 10 CASE NO. 1:09-cv–01352-BAM PC Plaintiff, 11 ORDER ADDRESSING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE v. (ECF Nos. 101, 102, 104) 12 CHRIS CHRONES, et al., 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Plaintiff Keith Zavala is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 16 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s second amended 17 complaint, filed May 24, 2010, against Defendants Chris Chrones, S. Kays, D. Smith, S. Chandler, 18 C. Martin, and Soto for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 19.) 19 This action is currently set for jury trial on February 12, 2013. (ECF No. 100.) 20 On September 25, 2012, an order issued requiring the parties to indicate whether a settlement 21 conference would be beneficial in this action. (ECF No. 101.) On October 15, 2012, Defendants 22 filed a response stating that they do not believe that this case is ripe for mediation. (ECF No. 102.) 23 Plaintiff filed a notice on the same date indicating that he is willing to engage in settlement 24 negotiations. (ECF NO. 104.) 25 Upon review of the responses of the parties, the Court declines to schedule a settlement 26 conference at this time. No settlement conference will be scheduled until such time as both parties 27 agree that settlement in the action is possible. Should both parties be willing to participate in a 28 /// 1 1 settlement conference in a good faith effort to settle this action, they may file a joint request for a 2 settlement conference. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: cm411 November 26, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?