Zavala v. Chrones et al

Filing 148

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/29/2013 requiring Defendants to respond to 147 MOTION for EXTENSION of Trial Date and Pretrial Order. (Filing Deadline: 2/1/2013). (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KEITH ZAVALA, 10 11 12 CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01352-BAM PC Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS’ TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL ORDER v. CHRIS CHRONES, et al., (ECF No. 147.) 13 Defendants. Deadline: February 1, 2013 14 / 15 Plaintiff Keith Zavala (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 16 in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s 17 second amended complaint against Defendants Chrones, Smith, Kays, Thomas-Chandler, Soto and 18 Martin for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. A motion in limine hearing 19 is scheduled for February 5, 2013, and a jury trial is scheduled for February 12, 2013. 20 On January 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of both the deadlines outlined in 21 the pretrial order and the February 12, 2013 trial date. (ECF No. 147.) Plaintiff explains that he 22 recently acquired legal representation, attorney James M. Hodges, and the current deadlines would 23 severely impair the ability to prepare for trial. 24 Given the approaching deadlines, Defendants are HEREBY ORDERED to file a response 25 to Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of the trial date and pretrial order dates on or before Friday, 26 February 1, 2013. 27 The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on James M. Hodges, 28 1 1 2 3 Attorney at Law, 16505 Clark Ave., Bellflower, California 90706. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10c20k January 29, 2013 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?