Zavala v. Chrones et al
Filing
148
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/29/2013 requiring Defendants to respond to 147 MOTION for EXTENSION of Trial Date and Pretrial Order. (Filing Deadline: 2/1/2013). (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
KEITH ZAVALA,
10
11
12
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01352-BAM PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS’ TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TRIAL DATE AND
PRETRIAL ORDER
v.
CHRIS CHRONES, et al.,
(ECF No. 147.)
13
Defendants.
Deadline: February 1, 2013
14
/
15
Plaintiff Keith Zavala (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
16
in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s
17
second amended complaint against Defendants Chrones, Smith, Kays, Thomas-Chandler, Soto and
18
Martin for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. A motion in limine hearing
19
is scheduled for February 5, 2013, and a jury trial is scheduled for February 12, 2013.
20
On January 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of both the deadlines outlined in
21
the pretrial order and the February 12, 2013 trial date. (ECF No. 147.) Plaintiff explains that he
22
recently acquired legal representation, attorney James M. Hodges, and the current deadlines would
23
severely impair the ability to prepare for trial.
24
Given the approaching deadlines, Defendants are HEREBY ORDERED to file a response
25
to Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of the trial date and pretrial order dates on or before Friday,
26
February 1, 2013.
27
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on James M. Hodges,
28
1
1
2
3
Attorney at Law, 16505 Clark Ave., Bellflower, California 90706.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
10c20k
January 29, 2013
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?