Zavala v. Chrones et al
Filing
88
ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/26/2012 adopting 87 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 76 Motion to Dismiss. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
KEITH ZAVALA,
8
9
10
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01352-LJO-DLB PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
v.
CHRIS CHRONES, et al.,
11
(ECF No. 87)
Defendants.
12
/
13
14
Plaintiff Keith Zavala (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil
15
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 2, 2011, Defendants S. Chandler, Chris
16
Chrones, S. Kays, C. Martin, D. Smith, and Soto (“Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No.
17
76. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
18
636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On June 11, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was
20
served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings and
21
Recommendations was to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 87. Plaintiff and Defendants did
22
not file a timely Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de
24
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and
25
Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1.
The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 11, 2012, is adopted in full;
28
2.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed November 2, 2011, is denied; and
1
1
3.
The matter is referred to the United State Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated:
b9ed48
July 26, 2012
/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?