Zavala v. Chrones et al

Filing 88

ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/26/2012 adopting 87 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 76 Motion to Dismiss. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KEITH ZAVALA, 8 9 10 CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01352-LJO-DLB PC Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS v. CHRIS CHRONES, et al., 11 (ECF No. 87) Defendants. 12 / 13 14 Plaintiff Keith Zavala (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 15 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 2, 2011, Defendants S. Chandler, Chris 16 Chrones, S. Kays, C. Martin, D. Smith, and Soto (“Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 17 76. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 18 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On June 11, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations which was 20 served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objection to the Findings and 21 Recommendations was to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 87. Plaintiff and Defendants did 22 not file a timely Objection to the Findings and Recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de 24 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and 25 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed June 11, 2012, is adopted in full; 28 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed November 2, 2011, is denied; and 1 1 3. The matter is referred to the United State Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: b9ed48 July 26, 2012 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?