Bryant v. Knight et al

Filing 55

ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 51 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/4/11. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8

JAMES E. BRYANT,

9

CASE NO. 1:09-CV-01367-AWI-DLB PC
Plaintiff,

10

v.

11

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS

J. KNIGHT, et al.,

12

(DOC. 51)
Defendants.

13

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
/

14
15

Plaintiff James E. Bryant (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California

16

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma

17

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding

18

against Defendants J. Knight and Davis. On August 31, 2011, Defendants filed a motion to

19

dismiss. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-

20

opposition, as required by Local Rule 230(l). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that

21

Plaintiff is to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty-one (21) days from

22

the date of service of this order. Failure to timely respond will b construed as a waiver of the

23

opportunity to file an opposition.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated:
3b142a

October 4, 2011

/s/ Dennis L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1