Struggs v. Hedgpeth

Filing 22

ORDER Denying Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Order to Obtain Mental Health Records 19 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/24/2010. (Verduzco, M)

Download PDF
(HC) Struggs v. Hedgpeth Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 CEDRIC LYNN STRUGGS, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U . S . D i s t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) HEDGPETH, ) ) Respondent. ) ________________________________) 1:09-cv-01368 MJS HC ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION REGARDING ORDER TO OBTAIN MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS [Docs. 19] Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. Local Rule 305(b). On December 2, 2009, Petitioner filed a motion requesting a court order to obtain mental health records relating to a March 27, 1981 hearing. (Mot. to Obtain Docs., ECF No. 12.) The motion was denied by a reasoned decision of this Court on July 16, 2010. (Order, ECF No. 18.) Petitioner's present motion for reconsideration is denied for the same reasons stated in the Court's previous order. Respondent has not yet filed a formal response to Petitioner's petition; he has been directed to do so. (Order to Respond, ECF No. 15.) In the event the response leads to a -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U . S . D i s t r ic t C o u r t E. D . C a lifo r n ia determination that this matter shall be heard on the merits, Petitioner may, for good casue shown, renew his motion to seek discovery. Therefore, at this time Petitioner's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ci4d6 August 24, 2010 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Michael J. Seng -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?