United States of America v. Approximately $188,207.24 in U.S. Currency Seized From Wells Fargo Bank Account No. 2012381455

Filing 4

Application and ORDER for Publication, signed by Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/12/2009. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAWRENCE G. BROWN United States Attorney DEANNA L. MARTINEZ Assistant United States Attorney United States Courthouse 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. APPROXIMATELY $188,207.24 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM WELLS FARGO BANK ACCOUNT NO. 2012381455, HELD IN THE NAME OF NOEL CASTILLO AND DENICE MARIE HECTOR, and APPROXIMATELY $199,832.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM BANK OF THE WEST SAFE DEPOSIT BOX NO. 200608, HELD IN THE NAME OF DENICE MARIE HECTOR, Defendants. __________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:09-CV-01390-AWI-SMS APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR PUBLICATION The United States of America, Plaintiff herein, applies for an order of publication as follows: 1. Rule G(4) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions (hereafter "Supplemental Rules") provides that the Plaintiff shall cause public notice of the action to be given in a newspaper of general circulation or on the official internet government forfeiture site; 1 APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR PUBLICATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Local Rule 83-171, Eastern District of California, provides that the Court shall designate by order the appropriate newspaper or other vehicle for publication; 3. The defendant approximately $188,207.24 in U.S. Currency seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account No. 2012381455, held in the name of Noel Castillo and Denice Marie Hector and the defendant approximately $199,832.00 in U.S. Currency Seized From Bank of the West Safe Deposit Box No. 200608, held in the name of Denice Marie Hector (hereafter collectively "defendant funds") were seized in the city of Turlock, Stanislaus County, California, and are in the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service, Eastern District of California. The Drug Enforcement Administration published notice of the nonjudicial forfeiture of the defendant funds on May 4, 11,and 18, 2009, in the Wall Street Journal. 4. Plaintiff proposes that publication be made as follows: a. b. c. d. One publication; Thirty (30) consecutive days; On the official internet government forfeiture site www.forfeiture.gov; The publication is to include the following: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) The Court and case number of the action; The date of the seizure/posting; The identity and/or description of the property seized/posted; The name and address of the attorney for the Plaintiff; A statement that claims of persons entitled to possession or claiming an interest pursuant to Supplemental Rule G(5) must be filed with the Court and served on the attorney for the Plaintiff no later than 60 days after the first day of publication on the official internet government forfeiture site; and (6) A statement that answers to the Complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Fed. R. Civ. P.") must be filed and served within 20 days after the filing of the claims and, in the absence thereof, default may be entered and /// /// 2 APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR PUBLICATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 condemnation ordered. Dated: August 6, 2009 LAWRENCE G. BROWN United States Attorney /s/ Deanna L. Martinez DEANNA L. MARTINEZ Assistant United States Attorney ORDER 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR PUBLICATION IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 August 12, 2009 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?