Royal v. Knight et al

Filing 28

ORDER Directing Defendants to Provide Documents to the Court, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/10/12. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

MARLIN LATTEREAL ROYAL,

10
11
12

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01407-BAM PC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO
PROVIDE DOCUMENTS TO THE COURT

v.
S. KNIGHT, et al.,

13

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
Defendants.
/

14
15

Plaintiff Marlin Lattereal Royal (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in

16

forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion

17

to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies on December 1, 2011. (ECF No. 23.)

18

Plaintiff filed an opposition on December 27, 2011, and Defendants filed a reply on December 28,

19

2011. (ECF Nos. 24, 25.)

20

A review of the exhibits attached to Defendants’ motion to dismiss reveals that Exhibit 3,

21

appeal no. SATF-E 09-1819, does not include the continuation page describing Plaintiff’s problem.

22

In order to determine what claims were brought in this appeal it is necessary for the Court to review

23

the entire appeal. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a complete copy

24

of appeal no. SATF-E 09-1819 within thirty days from the date of service of this order.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411

February 10, 2012

/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1