Moore v. Catalina Restaurant Group, Inc., et al.

Filing 8

ORDER re 7 Stipulation Regarding First Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint, Signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/10/2009. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants Catalina Restaurant Group, Inc., Carrows California Family Restaurants, Inc., Carrows Restaurants, Inc., dba Carrows, Hinds Investments, L.P. shall have up to and including October 8, 2009 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint on file in this matter. (Arellano, S.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER, COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP 4550 CALIFORNIA AVENUE, SECOND FLOOR

Paul Lafranchise, State Bar No.122528 KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER, COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP 4550 California Avenue, Second Floor Bakersfield, California 93309 P.O. Box 11172 Bakersfield, California 93389-1172 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Fresno Division) RONALD DEAN MOORE, Plaintiff, v. CATALINA RESTAURANT GROUP, INC., CARROWS CALIFORNIA FAMILY RESTAURANTS, INC., CARROWS RESTAURANTS, INC. dba CARROWS, HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P., a California Limited Partnership, and Does 1 - 10, Defendants. Case No. 1:09-cv-01423-OWW-SMS STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Local Rule 6-144 Complaint Filed: August 13, 2009

10
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93309 933

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-144, Plaintiff Ronald Dean Moore, through his attorney, Tanya Levinson Moore, Moore Law Firm, P.C., San Jose, California, and Defendants Catalina Restaurant Group, Inc., Carrows California Family Restaurants, Inc., Carrows Restaurants, Inc., dba Carrows, Hinds Investments, L.P., through their attorneys, Klein, DeNatale, Goldner, Cooper, Rosenlieb & Kimball, LLP, Bakersfield, California, hereby stipulate for the first time to extend the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Plaintiff's Complaint to up to 30 days from September 8, 2009, that is, until October 8, 2009. In the interim, Plaintiff shall not take or seek Defendants' default.
09cv1423.stipo.extend.time.answer.Moore.SMS.doc 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No CV-F-0552-LJO-SMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
KLEIN, DENATALE, GOLDNER, COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP 4550 CALIFORNIA AVENUE, SECOND FLOOR

There is good cause to extend the time for Defendants to respond to or answer Plaintiff's complaint because defense counsel was just retained two business days before Defendants' answer or response was due of September 8, 2009. Date: September 4, 2009 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

By:

/s/ Tanya Moore (as authorized on 9/4/09) Tanya Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff

Date: September 4, 2009

10
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA 93309

KLEIN, DeNATALE, GOLDNER, COOPER, ROSENLIEB & KIMBALL, LLP By: /s/ Paul Lafranchise Paul Lafranchise Attorneys for Defendants

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
09cv1423.stipo.extend.time.answer.Moore.SMS.doc

ORDER THE PARTIES HAVING SO STIPULATED, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants Catalina Restaurant Group, Inc., Carrows California Family Restaurants, Inc., Carrows Restaurants, Inc., dba Carrows, Hinds Investments, L.P. shall have up to and including October 8, 2009 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint on file in this matter. Dated: September 10, 2009 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No CV-F-0552-LJO-SMS