Gonzalez v. Kelly Services et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER of DISMISSAL with Respect to Defendant Kraft Foods, Inc. signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/6/2010. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 K. Poncho Baker, No. 156959 2 BARSOTTI & BAKER, LLP 3 4 6592 N. FIRST STREET FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93710 TELEPHONE: (559) 226-2100 FACSIMILE: (559) 226-7636 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff, MARIA TERESA GONZALEZ 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) Case No.: 1:09-CV-01426-LJO-GSA ) ) ) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 10 MARIA TERESA GONZALEZ 11 12 v. Plaintiff, 13 KRAFT FOODS, INC., KELLY SERVICES, and DOES 1-20, 14 INCLUSIVE 15 16 17 Defendants. Plaintiff MARIA TERESA GONZALEZ and Defendant KRAFT FOODS 18 GLOBAL, INC., hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 19 Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil 20 Procedure, Plaintiff MARIA TERESA GONZALEZ and Defendant KRAFT FOODS 21 GLOBAL, INC. stipulate and give notice the parties have resolved this dispute with 22 each party to bear its own fees and costs. Further, this matter is dismissed with 23 prejudice with respect to Defendant KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC. 24 This stipulation may be signed in counterparts and a copy deemed as 25 valid as the original. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL-ORDER (00003997).DOC STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER DATED: March 31, 2010 BARSOTTI & BAKER, LLP By: /s/ K. Poncho Baker K. Poncho Baker Attorneys for Plaintiff, MARIA TERESA GONZLEZ DATED: March 31, 2010 By: /s/David D. Sohn David D. Sohn Attorneys for Defendant, KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC. IT IS SO ORDERED: DATE: __April 6, 2010_________ _/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill___________ HONORABLE LAWRENCE J.O'NEILL U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?