Doolin v. Wong
Filing
133
ORDER Submitting Petitioner's Motions for Stay and Abeyance and for Additional Equitable Tolling; VACATING Hearing Set for January 9, 2012, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/6/12. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
KEITH ZON DOOLIN,
10
11
12
Petitioner,
vs.
MICHAEL MARTEL, Acting Warden
of San Quentin State Prison,
13
Respondent.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:09-CV-01453-AWI-P
DEATH PENALTY CASE
Order Submitting Petitioner’s
Motions for Stay and Abeyance
and for Additional Equitable
Tolling; Vacating Hearing Set for
January 9, 2012
15
16
On October 18, 2011, Petitioner Keith Zon Doolin (“Doolin”) filed his
17
federal petition, and concurrently filed a Motion for stay and abeyance. Doc. 86.
18
Respondent Michael Martel (“Warden”) opposed stay and abeyance. A hearing
19
was held on the motion for stay and abeyance November 28, 2011. On the same
20
day, Doolin filed a motion for futher equitable tolling. Doc. 126. At the hearing,
21
a ruling on the motion for stay and abeyance was deferred until briefing could be
22
submitted on the motion for further equitable tolling. The Warden filed an
23
opposition to further equitable tolling December 7, 2011, and Doolin filed a reply
24
January 3, 2012.
25
26
Doolin’s motion for stay and abeyance and his motion for further equitable
tolling shall be submitted and resolved without additional oral argument from
1
2
the parties. The hearing set for January 9, 2012, is vacated.
Doolin’s request for copies of certain pages of the lodged record, see Doc.
3
120, filed November 4, 2011, is denied without prejudice. Doolin may submit the
4
request again with information about the status of the state court’s order sealing
5
the documents.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
DATED:
January 6, 2012
10
/s/ Anthony W. Ishii
11
Chief United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
O Equ ita bleTo lling4 D ln
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?