Doolin v. Wong

Filing 133

ORDER Submitting Petitioner's Motions for Stay and Abeyance and for Additional Equitable Tolling; VACATING Hearing Set for January 9, 2012, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/6/12. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KEITH ZON DOOLIN, 10 11 12 Petitioner, vs. MICHAEL MARTEL, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison, 13 Respondent. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:09-CV-01453-AWI-P DEATH PENALTY CASE Order Submitting Petitioner’s Motions for Stay and Abeyance and for Additional Equitable Tolling; Vacating Hearing Set for January 9, 2012 15 16 On October 18, 2011, Petitioner Keith Zon Doolin (“Doolin”) filed his 17 federal petition, and concurrently filed a Motion for stay and abeyance. Doc. 86. 18 Respondent Michael Martel (“Warden”) opposed stay and abeyance. A hearing 19 was held on the motion for stay and abeyance November 28, 2011. On the same 20 day, Doolin filed a motion for futher equitable tolling. Doc. 126. At the hearing, 21 a ruling on the motion for stay and abeyance was deferred until briefing could be 22 submitted on the motion for further equitable tolling. The Warden filed an 23 opposition to further equitable tolling December 7, 2011, and Doolin filed a reply 24 January 3, 2012. 25 26 Doolin’s motion for stay and abeyance and his motion for further equitable tolling shall be submitted and resolved without additional oral argument from 1 2 the parties. The hearing set for January 9, 2012, is vacated. Doolin’s request for copies of certain pages of the lodged record, see Doc. 3 120, filed November 4, 2011, is denied without prejudice. Doolin may submit the 4 request again with information about the status of the state court’s order sealing 5 the documents. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 DATED: January 6, 2012 10 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii 11 Chief United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 O Equ ita bleTo lling4 D ln 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?