Doolin v. Wong

Filing 206

ORDER Re: Petitioner's Pro Se Submission 205 ,signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 04/24/18. (The Clerk is directed to return the instant pro se submission to Petitioner. Counsel for Petitioner are directed to provide him with a copy of this order) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 KEITH ZON DOOLIN 9 Petitioner, 10 11 Case No. 1:09-cv-01453-AWI-SAB DEATH PENALTY CASE ORDER RE: PETITIONER’S PRO SE SUBMISSION v. 12 RON DAVIS, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, 13 Respondent. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Before the Court is Petitioner’s pro se submission received by the Court Clerk and filed in the docket on April 16, 2018. (Doc. No. 205.) Therein, Petitioner revisits his previously rejected pro se request for relief. (See Doc. Nos. 203, 204.) Petitioner is again advised that because he is represented by appointed counsel in this proceeding, the Court will not consider pro se documents about the presentation of his case that are unrelated to representation by appointed counsel. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 191(c). Additionally, it remains that the Court is without authority to provide the remedy he seeks in state court. 21 22 23 Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to return to Petitioner a copy of the instant pro se submission (Doc. No. 205). Counsel for Petitioner, Robert Bryan and Pamala Sayasane, are directed to provide him with a copy of this order. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: April 24, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?