Angevine v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
35
ORDER Directing the Clerk of the Court to Close this Action signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 01/14/2014. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PAUL W. ANGEVINE,
12
13
14
15
16
1:09-cv-01496 GSA
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
THE COURT TO CLOSE THIS ACTION
Defendant.
17
On August 20, 2009, Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking a review of a final decision of the
18
19
Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying of his applications for disability
20
insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits pursuant to Titles II and XVI of the
21
Social Security Act. (Doc. 1) On December 17, 2010, this Court issued an order and judgment
22
affirming the Commissioner’s decision. (Docs. 19 & 20).
23
24
Plaintiff timely filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Docs. 23 and
25). On October 16, 2013, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a Memorandum reversing
25
the judgment of this Court with instructions that the case be remanded to the ALJ for a proper
26
27
28
1
1
review of Plaintiff’s mental impairments.1 (Doc. 32). A mandate was issued on December 11,
2
2013. (Doc. 33). On December 18, 2013, this Court issued an order remanding the case consistent
3
with the mandate issued by the Ninth Circuit. (Doc. 34). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is
4
directed to close this case.
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
Dated:
January 14, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
6i0kij8d
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The Court of Appeals noted that Plaintiff’s arguments regarding his mental impairment had not been raised before
this Court, but permitted Plaintiff to raise the issue on appeal. (Doc. 52-1, pgs. 2-3).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?