Prieto v. City of Porterville

Filing 20

ORDER denying 19 , Stipulated request for modification of scheduling order, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/16/2010. (Timken, A)

Prieto v. City of Porterville

Doc. 20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 On July 16, 2010, the parties filed a stipulation requesting that all deadlines set forth in the 16 December 23, 2009, Scheduling Order be extended. In the December 23, 2009, Scheduling Order, 17 the parties were explicitly instructed as follows: 18 19 20 In the parties' stipulated request, they provide no statement of good cause or even a reason 21 why all the deadlines applicable to all discovery and motions should be extended. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties' request for an extension of all 23 scheduling deadlines is DENIED. The parties may resubmit a request that sets forth good cause for 24 the desired extensions for the Court's consideration. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: ie14hj July 16, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ FRESNO DIVISION J.P., Minor, by her Guardian ad Litem RICARDO BLADERAS, et al., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PORTERVILLE, et al., Defendant. / CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01538-AWI-SKO ORDER DENYING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER

Stipulations extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause for granting the relief requested.