United States v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe SUV, VIN: 1GNFC13067J251913, License: 5XLP068

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and GRANTING 13 Motion for Default Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/1/2010. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 In this civil forfeiture action, Plaintiff United States of America moved for default judgment against the interests of Blanca Alvarez and Luis Miguel Raigoza in a 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe SUV, VIN: 1GNFC13067J251913, License: 5XLP068 (Doc. 13). The motion was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 5, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff's motion be granted (Doc. 16). The Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. No objections to the findings and recommendations were filed with the Court. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations, filed February 5, 2010, are adopted in full. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 March 1, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE v. 2007 CHEVROLET TAHOE SUV, VIN: 1GNFC13067J251913, LICENSE: 5XLP068 (Doc. 13) Defendant. / ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01542-LJO-SMS U N IT ED ST A T ES DISTRICT COU R T EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?