Anderson v. Marin, et al

Filing 49

ORDER Adopting 43 Findings and Recommendations and Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/7/13. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

WILLIAM LITTLE ANDERSON,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

1:09cv01547 LJO DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

v.
MARIN, et al.,

(Document 43)
13

Defendants.

14
15
/
16
17

Plaintiff William Little Anderson, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

18

pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was

19

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule

20

302.

21

On December 21, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations to

22

deny Plaintiff’s April 4, 2012, Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Findings and

23

Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the parties that any

24

objections were to be filed within fifteen days. Neither party filed objections within this time

25

frame.

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a

27

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the

28

Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

3

The Findings and Recommendations, filed December 21, 2012 (Document 43),
are ADOPTED in full; and

4

2.

Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED (Document 32).

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated:

February 7, 2013

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill
B9ed48
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2